The risky part is driving people away from Google products and services via uncertainty. Is now the time to put all your eggs into the Google Voice basket? Buy a bunch of Chrome PCs? I understand why they have to do it but it will definitely cause some people to adopt more of a wait-and-see approach.
This is what Microsoft understands that Google doesn't. Your platform users come first, before anything else. Microsoft assured that their platforms were good because they used their own platforms themselves. For eg. all Microsoft windows software would use the same API's that third-party developers would use. You look at Google and for them the platform and developers are secondary. API's are not only an afterthough…
Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
31–36 of 36 posts
Re: Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
#32This could mean a lot of potential opportunity for start-ups. If Google is shedding products because they don't fit with their core mission or business requirements, those might be some great areas to get into for different/smaller companies. In the end, they will probably focus on general purpose products with super large user bases (docs, maps, email, android, social network, offers, payments etc). Around those, wi…
Re: Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
#33The risky part is driving people away from Google products and services via uncertainty. Is now the time to put all your eggs into the Google Voice basket? Buy a bunch of Chrome PCs? I understand why they have to do it but it will definitely cause some people to adopt more of a wait-and-see approach.
Re: Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
#34This is off-topic and doesn't address the actual content of the article, but... "Trim a Bloated Ship"? That metaphor could use some work. How does a ship bloat? And wouldn't a bloated ship float pretty well? If you use the common meaning of trim (honestly, how many mariners read the NYT?), isn't cutting bits off a ship a bad thing? I guess it could be worse. I'll give thanks that Thomas Friedman didn't write it.
--George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language", 1946 (emphasis added)
Re: Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
Apple somewhat with the transplant of objective-c and next step into apple?
I thought about Apple, but I'm not sure it fits. The company Apple is today is the company that Jobs kept trying to build for 40 years. Proportional fonts and rounded buttons are the result of products, not technologies. Had he had a weaker personality and Woz a more assertive personality, then I think Apple would have needed to make that shift.
Re: Google’s Chief Works to Trim a Bloated Ship
#36This is off-topic and doesn't address the actual content of the article, but... "Trim a Bloated Ship"? That metaphor could use some work. How does a ship bloat? And wouldn't a bloated ship float pretty well? If you use the common meaning of trim (honestly, how many mariners read the NYT?), isn't cutting bits off a ship a bad thing? I guess it could be worse. I'll give thanks that Thomas Friedman didn't write it.