Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
31–40 of 50 posts
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#32What you describe is impossible. Apple reviews and approves every app in the store, so abusive apps can not be published.
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#33Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#34Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#35In addition to the other suggestions, send a note to Facebook that you purchased their "FaceBook for iPad" app (include a link to the app store page) and are extremely disappointed with the functionality. After Facebook legal complains to Apple about the app perhaps the submitter will be banned and all their apps removed or at least their apps will be under much stricter scrutiny. And a request of your own to remove…
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#36Contact Apple, but in a forceful way. Word it as a cease and desist, with a demand that the other app be removed or renamed, and send it to the App Store team, as well as Apple legal, and the developers themselves. Apple passes this stuff on verbatim to the other developer. (I have been on the receiving end myself.) If it's a mealy-mouthed pretty-please, I'm sure they'll ignore it, if they're dickish enough to name-s…
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#37Why not just release your own "Appname Pro", take out the advertisements, and charge $0.99?
The story behind Instapaper Free's cancellation covers some of the reasons: http://www.marco.org/2011/04/28/removed-instapaper-free
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#38Curious, what is the name of the app?
Re: Ask HN: Someone else made a "Pro" version of my app. What can I do about it?
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
IANAL and this really only applies to US law anyways, but isn't it a registered trademark that he doesn't have? That is, I thought trademarks accrued naturally just like copyright, but that registering them made it much easier to enforce claims. In this case the violation is clear and egregious enough that I wouldn't presume he couldn't win a trademark infringement case.
That's true, as I understand it. But if he was claiming a trademark on the name he'd need to put the "TM" after the name. (Not the R-in-a-cirlce, that's only for trademarks that have been registered.) But this stuff has lots of corner cases and I don't pretend to understand it all. More info: http://www.uspto.gov/faq/trademarks.jsp#_Toc275426672