Being concerned about "is nuclear being painted in a bad light" is not the right thing to focus on here, especially in a country that supports nuclear, like France. The real question is what France will do for power.
I would consider this a huge issue, especially in a warming world.
Also more important than being worried about the public image of nuclear, which is quite popular in France, is figuring out if and how France can construct new nuclear in the future. Even with their supportive population and regulatory structure, their Flamanville project is facing the exact same cost and delay issues as the recent projects in the US at VC Summer and Vogtle.
All this undermines the idea that public image or "ecologists" are the ones holding back nuclear power. The reality is that the industry, or technology itself, is not delivering.