Live data from Hacker News

Adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

1–10 of 29 posts

Re: Adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

#4

One quote that stood out from the start: "The [Lancet] study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals."

This has been known (but not allowed to be said) for at least 12 months at this point.

Re: Adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

#6

One quote that stood out from the start: "The [Lancet] study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals."

As always when it comes to vaccine fear-mongering, the Lancet study paints a non-alarming picture. The conclusion seems to be that a booster is required after around 9 months, which is what everyone and their mother worth listening to have been saying for the past year.

The Lancet article is worth a read.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Re: Adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

#8
> The media have so far concealed the adverse events of vaccine administration, such as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), owing to biased propaganda.

This statement seems completely unnecessary when discussing the vaccine effects based on scientific evidence. Only ends up casting a doubt on the motivations of the author.

Re: Adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines and measures to prevent them

#9

One quote that stood out from the start: "The [Lancet] study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals."

As always when it comes to vaccine fear-mongering, the Lancet study paints a non-alarming picture. The conclusion seems to be that a booster is required after around 9 months, which is what everyone and their mother worth listening to have been saying for the past year. The Lancet article is worth a read. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Super important to note that this is vaccine effectiveness against infection. It does not address the effectiveness of vaccines to prevent hospitalization or death.
Post reply on HN