Live data from Hacker News

In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

npr.org

21–30 of 176 posts

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#21
post #6

In Asia it is called marshrutka. It is amazing to see how US reinvents wheel and gives it cool names.

[OT]

> In Asia it is called ...

So a few billions of people, speaking a multitude of languages, all use the same name for a concept? How nice!

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#22
Do they pickup multiple passengers? It does seem like subsidized taxis, and not really "mass transit," but I'm glad it's helping people. I think a tram system powered by overhead lines is much more efficient, and better, they just need to lay the tracks.

I think about Berlin and how you can get just about anywhere on the tram system, and if you are well behaved your trip could be, well, free.. [0]

[0] https://www.nomadenberlin.com/blog2/public-transport-in-berl....

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#23

Via-shuttle is available in the SF Bay Area: https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/public-works/...

Yes, we have Via in Seattle, too.

It picks up people and takes them to the closest light rail station or takes them home from the station. It has a fixed radius of operation and typically there are 2-5 people in the van. It is a feeder system to bring riders to light rail trains.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#24
We had something like this in the exurbs of Calgary in the 1970s, it was called "DART", for "Dial-A-Ride Transit".

It was semi-on-demand, and not door-to-door.

The scheme was, you called the DART line (from your land-line, obviously) and gave your address, and there was a mini-bus that made the rounds of the residential neighborhood, which would come to your address on its next round. It would then take you to the local transit junction point, a nearby shopping mall with several bus bays where a number of regular bus routes converged, and you would make your connection and complete your journey in the regular way.

It seemed to me to be a reasonable way of efficiently delivering infrequent transit service to a large area, although I personally only used it a couple of times to visiit a friend.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#25

Aren’t these just subsidized taxis? They don’t help with congestion, they don’t help with pollution, I don’t see how they ultimately bring down costs since you still need individual cars and drivers... Perhaps in some limited cases, multiple people going the same way at the same time can share a vehicle, but how often will that work out in practice? I basically never end up sharing an Uber/Lyft with anyone else despi…

There are van taxis that do this in third world countries, they're not terrible. Faster than a bus line and cheaper than a regular taxi. I think if pooling was more of a norm and people were a bit less time sensitive it'd work great here with the support of an app.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#26
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cities have the demand to support real transit which is vastly more cost and energy efficient. They have congestion which isn't helped much by shuttles compared to a bus or other high capacity transit. Congestion also slows the shuttle down so you need more shuttles and more depots. They also have more destinations at cyclable distances. Paratransit is for mobility for theose who can't drive in areas that can't justi…

> They have congestion which isn't helped much by shuttles compared to a bus or other high capacity transit Multiple simultaneously driving taxis can be replaced by one shuttle van at times or for routes where large busses would run mostly empty, because they lack flexibility.

Yeah, if you need coverage shuttles are great albeit at a high marginal cost per trip. If you need capacity then they don't really work. A city will spend more on shuttles than they would on a network extensive and well designed enough to get good utilization.

I guess they are useful in some US cities as a stepping stone where there are massive political and legislative barriers to building a functional city.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#27
Another bad idea that keeps coming back. Real experts have written about it. Start with https://humantransit.org/2019/08/what-is-microtransit-for.ht... and be prepared to read for a while to understand why this is not a good idea despite the hype.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#28

We had something like this in the exurbs of Calgary in the 1970s, it was called "DART", for "Dial-A-Ride Transit". It was semi-on-demand, and not door-to-door. The scheme was, you called the DART line (from your land-line, obviously) and gave your address, and there was a mini-bus that made the rounds of the residential neighborhood, which would come to your address on its next round. It would then take you to the lo…

I’ve imagined that self driving cars would fill in this “last mile” from the end destination to an air conditioned transit hub. Once you get enough density in a transit hub, the frequency and destinations should explode, making the network usable, even in car heavy towns like Houston.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#29
post #18

Aren’t these just subsidized taxis? They don’t help with congestion, they don’t help with pollution, I don’t see how they ultimately bring down costs since you still need individual cars and drivers... Perhaps in some limited cases, multiple people going the same way at the same time can share a vehicle, but how often will that work out in practice? I basically never end up sharing an Uber/Lyft with anyone else despi…

> They don’t help with congestion, they don’t help with pollution, So what? The first and only point of a public transport system is, you know, transporting people. Limiting congestion and pollution comes very far in terms of priority, and only once the core mission is fulfilled.

They can't transport many people either though.

Re: In microtransit, passengers order a shuttle van instead of having to take a bus

#30
post #18

Aren’t these just subsidized taxis? They don’t help with congestion, they don’t help with pollution, I don’t see how they ultimately bring down costs since you still need individual cars and drivers... Perhaps in some limited cases, multiple people going the same way at the same time can share a vehicle, but how often will that work out in practice? I basically never end up sharing an Uber/Lyft with anyone else despi…

> They don’t help with congestion, they don’t help with pollution, So what? The first and only point of a public transport system is, you know, transporting people. Limiting congestion and pollution comes very far in terms of priority, and only once the core mission is fulfilled.

Plus, the counter-factual is not the same use of bus systems, but instead lower use of bus systems in favor of private ride share companies who don’t have the incentive to limit congestion or pollution at all. The consumer revolution has plainly exposed that people will consistently choose the more convenient option.
Post reply on HN