There's a significant population of science denying cranks and so those who want to raise legit concerns about the quality and alas, often motivation of medical studies are easily grouped with those. But: 1. There's no such thing as good / bad cholesterol. This is complete baloney and Pfizer lost a staggering amount of money when a drug raising good cholesterol got as far as human trials -- and failed them. There is…
That paper is very clear that they did not study misdiagnosis. They are a bit jargony with the use of "overdiagnosed."
"Overdiagnosed" does not mean incorrectly diagnosed, it means that there are subgroups who get a net harm from being treated.
A more understandable term for what they measure is "overtreated." The solution is likely better protocols for mild cases, not to state that ADHD is not a thing.