Live data from Hacker News

Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

trevorowens.tumblr.com

91–97 of 97 posts

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." -Michael Jordan

Was he the one who actually came up with that? It sounds suspiciously like Nike ad copy. In fact, it would make a very good Nike ad.

[deleted]

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#92
A lot behind success has to do with luck (quote from pg's "How to make wealth"). Perhaps Jobs was unique in that he was lucky in business twice, not just the once like most who succeed in business (e.g Microsoft Windows & Office), then can't do it again no matter how hard they try, even with a fortune to help.

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Jobs’s most important contribution was just general hustling." This is where I think you went wrong. You can have the greatest product in the World, and if you can't sell it, you're toast.

So the question is, who sold it, Jobs or Markkula?

Jobs sold Woz and Markkula on the idea of starting a company to build and sell computers, which was probably the most important sales job of all.

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I've missed more than 9000 shots in my career. I've lost almost 300 games. Twenty-six times I've been trusted to take the game winning shot and missed. I've failed over and over and over again in my life. And that is why I succeed." -Michael Jordan

Was he the one who actually came up with that? It sounds suspiciously like Nike ad copy. In fact, it would make a very good Nike ad.

Yep.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45mMioJ5szc

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#96

I cannot understand how you could read this biography and arrive at the conclusion that any one person should be "emulated". What I took away was that all components of Apple's success were mutually inclusive. It's unlikely that it could have happened any other way. You can pick a thousand points along the line wherein the events might have not come together as they did, and you do not end up with the Apple that exis…

Article is just trying to expel the misconceptions around Jobs and say that brilliant engineering is more important than design & reality distortion field in a startup.

This is an incredibly divisive mentality. The word "balance" gets thrown around a lot, but it's commonplace for a reason. Both engineering and "design & reality distortion" are valuable for a start up. You have to balance the two.

You're always going to have power struggles in startups. That's the nature of the beast when you put highly motivated, competitive individuals in a room, but the smartest of the players know that with the help of everyone around them, their chances of success increase many times over.

Re: Why Founders Should Emulate Wozniak, Not Jobs

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't bother you just lose your ability to flag.

Really? Interesting. Can you point me at the source? Perhaps I'm being downvoted because people think I'm going to stop exercising judgement. I meant merely that I was going to be less lazy.

I haven't seen it documented anywhere, just experienced it for myself.
Post reply on HN