Snapchat for Web
11–20 of 87 posts
Re: Snapchat for Web
#12> Everyday 332 million people open Snapchat on their phones, and with our camera, can start conversations with their real friends. Today, we’re introducing Snapchat for Web, a new way for our community to stay connected through our camera when they’re at their computers. > Open your laptop and head to web.snapchat.com using Chrome to start a call or pick up where chats left off on mobile. And those 332 million people…
Re: Snapchat for Web
#13Ah, Snap loves being weird for the sake of being weird. Snapchat was a constant struggle for me (Gen Z) to operate before I stopped using it. The latest reminder for how hip and weird they are (in their world): The text "web.snapchat.com" is blue, underlined ... but not actually a clickable link. How cute, quirky and hip! The youngsters will love it.
Re: Snapchat for Web
#14Now that they have a web client they should consider making an official Tor service like Facebook and Twitter have. It has been used for activism in the past.
Re: Snapchat for Web
#15Re: Snapchat for Web
#16Well that's cool for users with rooted Android devices, which are currently blocked from logging in with an obscure error message.
Re: Snapchat for Web
#17Re: Snapchat for Web
#18Well that's cool for users with rooted Android devices, which are currently blocked from logging in with an obscure error message.
It's not meant for mobile phones (who can install the Snapchat app already), clearly targeted for desktop users as a companion app
Grandparent comment explicitly states a rooted android phone cannot install the Snapchat app.
Snap has ensured it cannot work on a rooted device (as bank apps also do) to make it difficult to mess with the binary and end up saving or harvesting temporarily viewable content like snaps of genitalia or whatever people use snap for.
Re: Snapchat for Web
#19Quoted post unavailable.
Re: Snapchat for Web
#20Now that they have a web client they should consider making an official Tor service like Facebook and Twitter have. It has been used for activism in the past.
I don't know if that's irony, but do you really think that putting a service which cannot be trusted on Tor makes it trustworthy?