Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
11–20 of 299 posts
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#12Without peaceful growth, eventually there will be military growth [expansion by the means of military violence]. Op is right that our Earth is limited and cannot grow indefinitely. Sometimes it will be followed by redistribution of growth, so that someone will continue to grow, while others will experience radical negative growth
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#13Honestly I think this is obvious to anyone who is not financially motivated to think otherwise. The biggest problem is the rich have created a system in which people's future (retirement) is basically linked to "the market" growing over their lifetime. And the hopes that if they get lucky enough with the market they can retire early (or at all). This system of course is built 100% on governments/employers not wanting…
The majority of retirement the average middle class has is their home.
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#14Without peaceful growth, eventually there will be military growth [expansion by the means of military violence]. Op is right that our Earth is limited and cannot grow indefinitely. Sometimes it will be followed by redistribution of growth, so that someone will continue to grow, while others will experience radical negative growth
Why can’t we have stability?
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#15Is not growth inevitable? I hear criticisms of it but is it not what happens automatically when there is competition for resources? I can't really see what the alternative would be. I mean, ideally if you could just agree with everyone in the entire world that no one should strive for something better, we could stay where we are, but reaching such agreement seems impossible. And let's say instead we change direction…
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#16Is not growth inevitable? I hear criticisms of it but is it not what happens automatically when there is competition for resources? I can't really see what the alternative would be. I mean, ideally if you could just agree with everyone in the entire world that no one should strive for something better, we could stay where we are, but reaching such agreement seems impossible. And let's say instead we change direction…
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#17"If something cannot go on forever, it will stop."
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#18Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#19Without peaceful growth, eventually there will be military growth [expansion by the means of military violence]. Op is right that our Earth is limited and cannot grow indefinitely. Sometimes it will be followed by redistribution of growth, so that someone will continue to grow, while others will experience radical negative growth
Why can’t we have stability?
Re: Pioneering economist says our obsession with growth must end
#20This is true for companies, individuals, and even countries.
I say our obsession with _not_ growing must end!