Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. And why is your teen so desperate for attention that they're willing to get it from a random stranger on the internet? Instead of their friends or someone they know in real life? Jesus, this thread of an exercise of people making more and more convoluted excuses to treat their own children like criminals. Is this the HN that was against warrantless wiretapping, or did I mistakenly fall through into another forum…
You're obviously well convinced of your position; I haven't had to make one yet. I think a pure trust approach is laudable but scary. A common refrain from parents in these situations is how strong they thought their relationship with their child was and how they never imagined it could happen to them. Thats scary. Weighing a very low probability extreme consequence vs. various questionably impactful interventions wi…
And that's the essence of the decision.
IMHO, the sane move is not crippling your child's development and your trust relationship with them in exchange for preventing an extremely low probability event: that they will be approached by a sexual predator, who's convincing enough, decide not to talk about it with you, and successfully conceal it from you.
To me, it's a known harm (spying on your child) in exchange for a nebulous good (you might catch something).
Do I have conversations with my child about what they do online? Absolutely! Do I keep a weather eye on any new developments or characters who pop up? Absolutely!
But do I think the solution is technically spying on my child? Hell no. The proper means of redress are analog and emotional.