Live data from Hacker News

Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

readwriteweb.com

51–60 of 113 posts

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#51
post #32
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should be able to use Hubot with Grove as it provides IRC interface. We have few users already using it.

Assuming you'll have to create an entirely new Grove account for each bot you want to add, though?

That's fairly typical though.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#53

Neat. Easy hosted custom plugins/bots would be awesome. You can run your own IRC bot, of course, but then you have to worry about finding a server to run it on, keep it running, etc.

Agreed. We need to figure out a good way to do better bot integration! (suggestions welcome)

I would suggest something like Twilio where you host your own xml at a specified url that twilio calls when it receives a call/sms for you. Similarly grove api consumers can specify a url that can be called by grove when a message is received in a channel and api consumers can respond ina predefined json.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just keep trying, I got 500s a couple of times too.

Sorry, our server is swamped right now. I'm working on it... Update: I've made a few tweaks and it should be better now. fingers crossed

Works fine now! Thanks.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#56
post #24
post #16

I'd be interested to know how this stacks up against HipChat. I'm not sure what I'm missing out on, but it would be good to hear if there is something.

The major advantage I see with this over HipChat is that you can use existing IRC client software to connect. Personally, I'd much prefer Irssi in a terminal to an Adobe AIR product.

I can see the reasons for that, but the HipChat application lets you drag and drop files to share them with everyone in a room, auto-loads images... that alone is worth the client app to me.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#57

Neat. Easy hosted custom plugins/bots would be awesome. You can run your own IRC bot, of course, but then you have to worry about finding a server to run it on, keep it running, etc.

Agreed. We need to figure out a good way to do better bot integration! (suggestions welcome)

I'd probably start with a configurable bot with a few predefined plugins (RSS feeds, version control / bug tracker integration, etc) and a configuration UI (similar to Github's Services hooks)

Eventually you could add a way to define custom plugins that are properly sandboxed.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#58

Is it going to remain free? Would consider moving our internal irc server here but am concerned that in a few months it will become pay only?

No, it won't remain free forever. Soon we'll having pricing plans that are comparable to existing team chat products.

How unfortunate.

I've been working on an open source version of what you're purporting to provide as a service.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#59
post #54

Nice work, Leah! Love the fact that it's just IRC at heart. Is there any way to integrate a file-uploading facility (drag'n'drop in the web client, ideally, like Campfire) to the IRC concept, or is that an impedance mismatch?

Thanks!! I'd love to add some file uploading and/or hosting capability. I think it would be easy enough on the website side of things but I'm not sure yet what it would mean for existing IRC clients.

Re: Grove.io: Hosted, Searchable IRC Chat For Teams

#60
What's the advantage of an IRC-backed chat vs. a Jabber-backed chat?

Sure, IRC's protocol is simpler, but it's also not designed to support authentication or security natively, or to be federated in a "cross-network" way like XMPP is. It seems that XMPP is more modern, more flexible, and supports real user authentication natively - a win in every respect.

Plus most of the clients people these days use for IRC (Adium, irssi, Pidgin, XChat) support Jabber anyway.

Post reply on HN