I don’t intend to diminish the article itself, since yes ditching chrome and Google is a win for personal privacy. But I can’t ignore the irony of this article loading dozens of trackers. Like, is the cognitive dissonance that bad in web publishing? Do the teams writing the content not know about the way the publisher presents the data? Is this just pure hypocrisy? I’m at a loss.
In fairness, the person writing the article doesn't really have a say in the infra that the publisher is using. I agree that doesn't make the hypocrisy magically disappear, but it shouldn't detract from the points being made about the platforms we use to access the web.
Warren Buffet can advocate for changes in the tax laws that benefit the country while still playing hard by the existing rules.
Authors can advocate for changes to the web while their host is still doing the bad thing.
These can be seen as hypocrisy, but I think there is a large dose of honesty and in some cases humility in these situations.