Live data from Hacker News

Compare Webb's Images to Hubble

johnedchristensen.github.io

251–254 of 254 posts

Re: Compare Webb's Images to Hubble

#251
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

deconvolution, but it's more art than science because the problem is ill conditioned and blows up without regularization-- particularly if any part of the spike is overexposed (which it usually as you only notice the spikes on extremely bright stars).

Hmm - maybe a use case for (trained?) machine learning? I don't have much idea about ML so not sure if it makes any sense.

There is machine learning to remove stars called starnet, though last I checked it doesn't to an great job with diffraction that severe. Starnet is used by astrophotographers to enhance the contrast of nebula without getting artifacts from stars or to make completely starless nebula images.

If someone got starnet to remove the stars in the JWT images it wouldn't then be hard to go overlay stars back in without the diffraction.

Re: Compare Webb's Images to Hubble

#254
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed! In the SMACS 0723 image, there is a red spiral galaxy near the top right which is effectively not present in the HST image because it was redshifted out of the spectrum. This implies it's one of the galaxies receding the fastest from us in the image right? And therefore also among the oldest and farthest away? https://blog.wolfd.me/hubble-jwst/

Yes, well 2 possible effects: 1) as you said, its flux is predominantly in the IR 2) it could have been fainter than the sensitivity of the HST instruments but now seen because of the sensitivity of JWST But given that it appears so bright in the JWST image similar to other nearby galaxies that do appear in the HST image, your bet on #1 seems reasonable. Also there is another point: rather than a highly redshifted ga…

Isn't there a 3rd possibility that the galaxy is quenched leaving only redder stars?
Post reply on HN