Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a fast typer, and I understand where you're coming from! But note how there's a small (200ms by default but can be configured) delay when the auto-cd happens. This is actually pretty important, because otherwise it's impossible to see where you cd'd to. Importantly, during this delay, the keystrokes are eaten (so they are not fed down to the next level), and from my experience this is enough to basically never ac…
OK, delay sounds good.
Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
71–80 of 206 posts
Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#72Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#73Looks great! I was thinking of a rusty pet project for the same thing :) I haven't seen it mentioned yet, but Ranger is a great alternative tool, it can even be integrated into vim [0]: https://github.com/ranger/ranger
Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#74curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mgunyho/tere/master/Cargo.lock | grep source | wc -l 51 How come that such a simple tool has more than half a century of dependencies? This is terrifying.
Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#75Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#76curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mgunyho/tere/master/Cargo.lock | grep source | wc -l 51 How come that such a simple tool has more than half a century of dependencies? This is terrifying.
Well, that's Rust for you. They somehow think that having a boatload of dependencies with nondescript names (smawk, parking_lot_core, serde, clap - I feel like I'm having a stroke) is a feature. I'm not even joking.
Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#77Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#78curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mgunyho/tere/master/Cargo.lock | grep source | wc -l 51 How come that such a simple tool has more than half a century of dependencies? This is terrifying.
I tried to avoid bloat as much as possible, and I would argue that the non-transitive deps are pretty essential. I'l look into tweaking some features as suggested in sibling to trim it further down. But you're right that it could always be simpler, in fact I wrote tere originally in C with curses as the only dependency, and it compiles >10x faster. But there I had to manually write some (pretty certainly buggy) unico…
Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#79Re: Show HN: tere – A Faster Alternative to cd+ls
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
> that actively penalises fast typers, I think the word you are looking for is “indirectly”.
That feels kinda direct though?