Earlier quoted context omitted.
personally I believe the most rational approach is to believe realistically and act optimistically. I believe whatever I think is most likely to be true, not what I want to be true. However in certain cases I may act as if what I wish were true is in fact true, just because it makes life better (doesn't apply to all scenarios though)
Why believe at all? What will happen will happen. If that's the end of civilization or a golden utopia will reveal itself in due time. Regardless, the way to act is the same, that is, true to yourself.
Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
61–70 of 221 posts
Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#62Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#63I don't think tomorrow will be any better or worse than today. Why should it? Technology isn't magic, despite what Arthur C. Clarke thought.
Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#64What makes me optimistic about the future is that humans are clearly past peak, now, and will factor themselves out of the planet's equation before too very much longer.
Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#65Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#66Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#67Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#68Re: Ask HN: What makes you optimistic about the future?
#69People are well aware of the glamorous fields of physics: cosmology and particle physics. These are the disciplines that concern the frontiers of the very large and the very small respectively. I don't care so much about those. The frontier that I'm most interested in is the most abstract one: complexity. Physics has traditionally tackled problems that were either simple or could be made simple. Progress was made after the 1980s with the rise of solid state physics and associated attitudes towards emergence, but now? With the advent of statistical learning, advances in nonlinear dynamics and so on? Physicists are starting to tackle some insanely complex systems. Not to mention of course that computers are getting more powerful with time as per Moore's law, so simulations are really coming into their own as useful scientific approaches. Imagine the computational physicist of the 2050s, imagine the tools that she might have at hand to solve problems like the physics of life, or perhaps the phase diagrams of extremely heterogenous materials, or so on...
I can't help but be extremely excited! Here's to hoping that humanity makes it that far. :)