Would love to crowdsource an effort to buy enough disk space to backup YouTube to the Internet Archive and have ArchiveTeam perform the archival op. Assuming ~35PB of content stored at YT, should cost roughly $70M for IA to buy the necessary storage infra and maintain it into the future (their costs are ~$2/GB for perpetual storage).
If you've spent any time on YouTube, it's painfully obvious much of it is not worth archiving at all. Clearly if you had some critera to select videos that are worth preserving, this task would become a lot more doable. But what could those criteria be? You can't just select out all those fast-talking "influencers" that shill and lie their way through hours worth of video just because they're shit, because sometimes…
52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
21–30 of 60 posts
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#22YouTube is deleting pre-2010 videos, meanwhile anything is still possible at https://www.zombo.com
There's a circle, with circles around, with something around one of these smaller circles. All of it is spinning. I've managed to click the spinny thingy and it turned into quadratic spinny thingy.
That's all.
What the fuck?
Please explain!
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#23YouTube is deleting pre-2010 videos, meanwhile anything is still possible at https://www.zombo.com
I've clicked that. There's a circle, with circles around, with something around one of these smaller circles. All of it is spinning. I've managed to click the spinny thingy and it turned into quadratic spinny thingy. That's all. What the fuck? Please explain!
(You're not missing anything.)
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#24Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#25Would love to crowdsource an effort to buy enough disk space to backup YouTube to the Internet Archive and have ArchiveTeam perform the archival op. Assuming ~35PB of content stored at YT, should cost roughly $70M for IA to buy the necessary storage infra and maintain it into the future (their costs are ~$2/GB for perpetual storage).
If you've spent any time on YouTube, it's painfully obvious much of it is not worth archiving at all. Clearly if you had some critera to select videos that are worth preserving, this task would become a lot more doable. But what could those criteria be? You can't just select out all those fast-talking "influencers" that shill and lie their way through hours worth of video just because they're shit, because sometimes…
That's really unlikely, given it's all just digital and electricity. Ignoring that our pseudo-global society will have collapsed long before that and ignoring that the digital era unlikely lasts that long ...
... assuming humanity actually keeps going as it is ...
... there is no way people in 300 years will be able to read any device from today. Hell, the CD-ROM is dying and that's young.
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#26aka 52% of youtube from the era where it was fun have been deleted. badger badger badger badger mushROOM MUSSHROOOMM!!
That specific video actually predated YouTube itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badgers_(animation) And it’s still up on YouTube: https://youtu.be/EIyixC9NsLI
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#27Would love to crowdsource an effort to buy enough disk space to backup YouTube to the Internet Archive and have ArchiveTeam perform the archival op. Assuming ~35PB of content stored at YT, should cost roughly $70M for IA to buy the necessary storage infra and maintain it into the future (their costs are ~$2/GB for perpetual storage).
If you've spent any time on YouTube, it's painfully obvious much of it is not worth archiving at all. Clearly if you had some critera to select videos that are worth preserving, this task would become a lot more doable. But what could those criteria be? You can't just select out all those fast-talking "influencers" that shill and lie their way through hours worth of video just because they're shit, because sometimes…
One of the most impressive things you can do is, try searching up a landmark. My personal favorite is the [Jumping Stone](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1TtMN8nXTM) on the Nias Island of Indonesia. What would have otherwise just remained a novel tourist attraction, forgotten by the modernity of the 21st century, is now essentially a "tag" which has hours of footage associated with it. Thousands of tourists travelling back and forth, locals growing old, new people being born, buildings being built and demolished around it. You can even just study how video quality improved in that particular region. That there IS something wholly unique to this era and definitely worth preserving. YouTube as a company has figured the logistics of storing it, but the question of how humans can hope to read such data remains yet unanswered.
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#28YouTube is deleting pre-2010 videos, meanwhile anything is still possible at https://www.zombo.com
I've clicked that. There's a circle, with circles around, with something around one of these smaller circles. All of it is spinning. I've managed to click the spinny thingy and it turned into quadratic spinny thingy. That's all. What the fuck? Please explain!
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#29YouTube is deleting pre-2010 videos, meanwhile anything is still possible at https://www.zombo.com
I've clicked that. There's a circle, with circles around, with something around one of these smaller circles. All of it is spinning. I've managed to click the spinny thingy and it turned into quadratic spinny thingy. That's all. What the fuck? Please explain!
Re: 52% of YouTube videos live in 2010 have been deleted
#30Youtube also does its best to prevent you from downloading videos, to leave no record of the past.
They will start selling the past to us. YouTube Archive Plus.