Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
1–10 of 634 posts
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#2I feel the wheel of consent is a wonderful tool for making sense of such situations. Who is actually giving and who is receiving? Did both parties agree to?
https://www.wheelofconsent.coach/what-is-the-wheel-of-consen...
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#3Depictions of oneself are part of your identity, but the only way to control such things is via copyright, which is assigned to the person filming.
Could really use some new laws here.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#4Depictions of oneself are part of your identity, but the only way to control such things is via copyright, which is assigned to the person filming. Could really use some new laws here.
If a person is the main subject of a picture, the photographer (or videographer) needa consent of the model to use that image or vidoe. Already under current law in most places. And most legitimate publishers ask for proof of consent when buying, before publishing such pictures. That social media firms don't care is not a big surprise.
Edit: And that influencers think they are above existing laws when it comes to consent ain't a big surprise neither. I agree with the woman here, handing stuff to people that don't want it, lying to them about being filmed and using the footage for petty self promotion and monetary gain is the opposite of kindness. In fact it is borderline abbusive.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#5I don’t know if it’s news but she’s kinda right in calling it out for how fake and sinister these trends are and how these people profit from them
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#6Depictions of oneself are part of your identity, but the only way to control such things is via copyright, which is assigned to the person filming. Could really use some new laws here.
It depends on the country. Filming someone in public where they are the subject of the video (or photo) without their consent is illegal in France. If this had been recorded in France instead of Australia, the rights of the subject (the woman) to her image would trump any right to film in a public place of a Tiktok creator.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#7It’s not that hard to just say that the idea of creating huge monetary incentives to harass, interrupt, or just distract people in public was a bad idea.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#8Depictions of oneself are part of your identity, but the only way to control such things is via copyright, which is assigned to the person filming. Could really use some new laws here.
If a person is the main subject of a picture, the photographer (or videographer) needa consent of the model to use that image or vidoe. Already under current law in most places. And most legitimate publishers ask for proof of consent when buying, before publishing such pictures. That social media firms don't care is not a big surprise. Edit: And that influencers think they are above existing laws when it comes to con…
"Just enforce the existing laws in a reasonable manner" seems to be the solution to a lot of problems these days.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#9> the video was “designed to spread love and compassion”
Hmmm.... seems more likely designed to get engagement.
Presumably he doesn't love the woman, as he doesn't know anything at all about her, so that one is a lie for a start.
And I guess he doesn't feel any compassion for her either, as he hasn't taken it down without forcing her to contact him, which she probably doesn't want to do.
Re: Woman ‘dehumanised’ by viral TikTok filmed without her consent
#10Depictions of oneself are part of your identity, but the only way to control such things is via copyright, which is assigned to the person filming. Could really use some new laws here.
It depends on the country. Filming someone in public where they are the subject of the video (or photo) without their consent is illegal in France. If this had been recorded in France instead of Australia, the rights of the subject (the woman) to her image would trump any right to film in a public place of a Tiktok creator.
Derek Chauvin would appreciate that.