Live data from Hacker News

Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

theguardian.com

71–80 of 170 posts

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#71
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't understand that if society provides you no benefits, and you pay into taxes from otherwise (sans the fact you're an illegal immigrant) legitimate labor, it's almost impossible to be a net drain?

I think you may be labouring under the burden of prejudice.

As we all are.

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#72
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Isn't allowed by whom exactly? Simply allow immigrants to vote. Have no work permits, thus working as cheap labor? Give them permits. It's appalling how people pretend that they don't have anything against immigrants but they are against illegal immigrants as if the paperwork for legal work is a natural phenomenon and they can't do anything about it.

> Simply allow immigrants to vote. You've just given me a great business idea. Votes for hire. I bet I could charge a fortune, and I would only have to pass a small fraction of that on to the immigrants I employ.

Why is that different to money for votes?

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#73

Illegal immigration into the UK from the third world is far greater now than it was in the era of Mo Farah's childhood. I have to wonder how the UK social construct can survive with the huge numbers of people entering given the lack of housing, water, food etc https://youtu.be/PAeRejE467g

They don't.

There's a reason why right wing parties are popular for the working poor and why Brexit and anti-immigration in general is most popular in the most economically depressed areas.

Liberals aren't doing themselves any favors by sweeping thins like the Rotherham child rape gangs and Manchester Arena bombing under the rug because they happened to white trash.

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wage dilution is an issue. It's the working and middle classes that are most harmed by immigration. Those who are in the position to not have their wages threatened by mass immigration policies are free to reap the rewards of cheap labor, but for those who are in the position of being outcompeted by incoming labor, immigration is a drawback not an asset. Naturally, policymakers are in the former category, and as such…

> It's the working and middle classes that are most harmed by immigration. Didn't farmers complain that British (working class?)citizens[1] weren't up for picking fruits after East Europeans hit the Brexit? The same working & middle class rely on cheap fruits, so it's not a simple equation where fewer immigrants = better jobs. 1. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-suffolk-61568286

I'm not sure how to respond without being glib, but there's more to life than fruit.

Safe working conditions are worth 5 pound strawberries.

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Better link Europe’s most fortified border is in Africa sub saharan illegal immigrants into europe https://youtu.be/LY_Yiu2U2Ts

Muhammad is most popular name in the UK for fifth year running, survey finds https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/muhammad-most-popular-nam...

That is due to a lack of variance in names within a subpopulation.

Everyone and his cousin is called Mohammed, heck in certain areas even girls have it as a second name.

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's the working and middle classes that are most harmed by immigration. Didn't farmers complain that British (working class?)citizens[1] weren't up for picking fruits after East Europeans hit the Brexit? The same working & middle class rely on cheap fruits, so it's not a simple equation where fewer immigrants = better jobs. 1. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-suffolk-61568286

I'm not sure how to respond without being glib, but there's more to life than fruit. Safe working conditions are worth 5 pound strawberries.

Sure - there's more to life than fruit, massages, receiving trucked goods, and being attended to by health techs - but add it all up and you're missing quite a huge chunk of "life", IMO.

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Muhammad is most popular name in the UK for fifth year running, survey finds https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/muhammad-most-popular-nam...

That is due to a lack of variance in names within a subpopulation. Everyone and his cousin is called Mohammed, heck in certain areas even girls have it as a second name.

This is the entire UK population, not a 'sub population'...

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#78
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most immigrants are economically very active since starting a new life from zero requires that. Unless you can't physically fit people in the island, the solution would be to let the immigrants work legally. Number of houses are not fixed like the total number of bitcoins, people can build new ones. Despite the political rhetoric and recent trends, immigration is a good thing and the problems it causes can be reduced…

Wage dilution is an issue. It's the working and middle classes that are most harmed by immigration. Those who are in the position to not have their wages threatened by mass immigration policies are free to reap the rewards of cheap labor, but for those who are in the position of being outcompeted by incoming labor, immigration is a drawback not an asset. Naturally, policymakers are in the former category, and as such…

No, it's not, this is called the lump of labor fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lump_of_labour_fallacy

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#79
post #21
post #8

Gosh this is such a heartbreaking and yet fascinating story. The BBC version is has more detail including some possible immigration jeopardy for Sir Mo due to getting citizenship under an assumed name: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-62123886 In the documentary, barrister Alan Briddock tells Sir Mo his nationality was technically "obtained by fraud or misrepresentations". Legally, the government can remove a person's Bri…

> No action whatsoever will be taken against Sir Mo and to suggest otherwise is wrong,” a spokesperson said. I agree the "he law should be solidly on his side and not have to rely on the kindness of some civil servant " It is for Sir Mo Farah. Good on him, respect. But for Ahmed the minimum wage worker, they would be in detention and booked on an aeroplane to Rwanda before you could say "class ridden hell hole". Good…

Not sure I understand the point you are making. That everyone should be able to cheat the immigration system?

Re: Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked into the UK using another child’s name

#80
post #79
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> No action whatsoever will be taken against Sir Mo and to suggest otherwise is wrong,” a spokesperson said. I agree the "he law should be solidly on his side and not have to rely on the kindness of some civil servant " It is for Sir Mo Farah. Good on him, respect. But for Ahmed the minimum wage worker, they would be in detention and booked on an aeroplane to Rwanda before you could say "class ridden hell hole". Good…

Not sure I understand the point you are making. That everyone should be able to cheat the immigration system?

No post body was provided.
Post reply on HN