Live data from Hacker News

Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]

jimedwardsnrx.files.wordpress.com

91–100 of 276 posts

Re: Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]

#92

Always a classic, and it never fails to make me laugh when I scroll through the smiley face section. Impossible to unsee: https://www.cannotunsee.net/post/730928004/pepsi/amp

Yes.

https://www.utne.com/arts/new-pepsi-logo-is-a-joke/

Re: Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]

#93

despite how silly this may seem to many in the HN audience, I will contend that: if you were running a multi-billion dollar sugar water company whose main moat is the brand, and spent hundreds of millions on ads each year as one of the key line items in the budget, you too would want this level of sophistication and thought put into a brand refresh. Probably even more. And you can imagine that this document was debat…

Nearly agree -- you would want the level of sophistication that this pretends to have. That it tricked management into thinking it has? (pretty damning if so)

Re: Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]

#98
When a marketing company does it for a soft drinks company does it, it gets ridiculed.

When an engineer does it for the design of rollercoasters or boats, it gets praised.

https://blogs.lt.vt.edu/2ndyearidlab/author/hohsuan/page/2/

I see little difference of concepts used for the 'fair curve' and those of designing a bottle.

Re: Pepsi: Breathtaking Design Strategy (2008) [pdf]

#99

despite how silly this may seem to many in the HN audience, I will contend that: if you were running a multi-billion dollar sugar water company whose main moat is the brand, and spent hundreds of millions on ads each year as one of the key line items in the budget, you too would want this level of sophistication and thought put into a brand refresh. Probably even more. And you can imagine that this document was debat…

Nearly agree -- you would want the level of sophistication that this pretends to have. That it tricked management into thinking it has? (pretty damning if so)

Any rational individual can see this is chicanery of the highest level. It takes an entire committee to be able to rationalize away the absurdity.
Post reply on HN