Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am amused by how clear it is to spot those that didn't even bother to open the link. All of them, no exceptions, could be summarized as "I am completely ignorant of what's actually being talked about and I am not really inclined to dig deeper into it. Anyway, let me interject with my worthless opinion and find a way to make this about me ." But then again, perhaps this could be a meta-commentary about how American…
What’s wrong with someone coming to HN for the comments? The headline allows for commenting about that subject. For all you or I know, this story has most of its upvotes by people who want to talk about or read comments about Costco, not the story of the article.
I don't mind reading the comments without reading the story. I mind people writing comments without reading the story.
> most (...) want to talk about (...) Costco, not the story of the article.
And that is incredibly shallow. If I wanted to read senseless comments based on the title of an piece, I'd just prompt GPT-3 for random wikipedia entries.