Earlier quoted context omitted.
I actually do think it’s relevant. They build credibility in your mind space via innocuous stories about peppers, so you’re more likely to accept their articles about more charged topics in the future.
I think this is a weird take. You could analyze every human interest piece this way. Is that what the NYT does with Page Six? I read that and then don't think about the fossil fuel or tech companies' influence on their stories? Just read a story about chili peppers and don't get all Joseph McCarthy about it.
Absolutely.
They pushed the US Middle East wars at key points. Why not?