Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
71–80 of 278 posts
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there are meaning behind this number (apart from nazism, obviously)? Otherwise it seems kinda odd.
1888 is the year that, when written in Roman numerals, has the most digits (so far). But it’s probably just to make it seem more of a bargain than $1,999,000.
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#73Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#74Bulgari made a much better looking flat watch IMO but unfortunately it was fatter than this one.
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is there are meaning behind this number (apart from nazism, obviously)? Otherwise it seems kinda odd.
In China 8 is considered to be a really lucky number, signifying wealth. https://www.mansionglobal.com/articles/it-s-in-the-numbers-l...
So, it is no wonder that the number 8 figures prominently.
In 2021, in Swiss watch exports in CHF bn:
to USA, China about 3 each; HK about 2; Japan about 1.5; Italy, Germany, Singapore, UAE, France about 1 each.
http://www.fhs.swiss/scripts/getstat.php?file=histo_regions_...
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#76William Gibson wrote a piece for Wired back in the day about his obsession with mechanical watches.[1] He puts it thus: ``` Mechanical watches are so brilliantly unnecessary. Any Swatch or Casio keeps better time, and high-end contemporary Swiss watches are priced like small cars. But mechanical watches partake of what my friend John Clute calls the Tamagotchi Gesture. They're pointless in a peculiarly needful way; t…
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#77I'm disappointed to see this merger of art and engineering received so poorly here. This pushes the envelope of the possible, something I consider beautiful. It's roughly as impractical, expensive, and awkward looking, as a human-propelled airplane. I don't think any of the many commenters here who panned this watch would have anything bad to say about a human-propelled airplane. It's a pity that they can't appreciat…
There's an entire economy dedicated to pandering to the pretensions of the vulgar rich, and it certainly fits in there.
But as a design classic - no.
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
A much too thick one, unfortunately.
I think that's subjective. I have no problems with mine!
OLED panels are less than 1mm thick, so the display wouldn't be a problem.
I'd honestly be more interested in that as a product than in a clockwork Veblen toy.
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#79Slightly offtopic: If anyone missed Bartosz Ciechanowski's website explaining how mechanical watsches work, you sold at least look at it once. It is a piece of art. https://ciechanow.ski/mechanical-watch/
Re: Ultra-flat timepiece, the RM UP-01 Ferrari, is 1.75 millimetres thick watch
#80It's the same as a Lamborghini. Something you can enjoy, with an acceptable level of depreciation, insurable as collateral on a loan for leverage into other productive assets, with a good and liquid aftermarket. Portability between countries is important as well for other kinds of transactions.
The engineering really is pretty cool, and what an amazing job it would be to design products to become alternative assets. Literally, art. What markets are missing now is assets like these to put rapidly deteriorating cash into, and the timing of the release of this watch is impeccable as people rush to get out of cash and look for alternative assets. Engineering like this also cuts out the curators and gatekeepers who appraise art (paintings were the original NFTs, imo), and sets a very high bar for entry for any imitators. One of the problems of wealth after a certain point is finding ways to appreciate and enjoy it instead of the drag of just managing it all. Something like this, you put a couple million into, get some enjoyment out of it, then when you want out, you get more than inflation adjusted remainder out of it, or take a small loss that isn't as bad as what you lost in another asset bubble popping had you put the money there.
Realistically, if there is something people love, with some engineering and craft you can make a million dollar+ version of it. They are beautiful examples of what they are, and the business of many of these things is the financial engineering around them.