Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, since in the last 20 years US invaded Iraq, Afganistan and Lybia while PRC invaded 0 countries.
"Invaded" language and situational nuance aside, that has everything to do with superpower status and nothing to do with being authoritarian...
A global superpower that systematically employs military agression to impose its will somewhere far away around the globe is definitely authoritarian. Even if it had managed to create a convincing brand of democracy benifiting only, like, 5% of global population.