Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Remember: others' work is theirs unless they license it to you. But Google scraping the web is somehow allowed? I'm not against it but these laws seem arbitrary.
All laws are arbitrary. But the story of how we got them is meaningful. Copyright exists to encourage more copyable stuff to be made (pg has a good essay on this topic, where he observes history shows the opposite of a copyright regime isn't openness... It's guilds and secrecy cults). What Google does (interpreting the data that scans to help you find references to searches) is considered either transformative work,…
This is a backward legitimization attempt. Copyright was made because editors, authors and composers lobbied to get a monopoly on their creations and derivative work. As a matter of fact, copyright was continuously expanded on requests from rent-seeking copyright holders (which, in the overwhelming majority of case, aren't creators of any kind).