Apparently there was a "blogpost" of a developer showing of their code, where they accidentally leaked access tokens in a piece of commented code: https://archive.ph/mP3bh This is completely unverified though, so take it with a grain of salt.
It's incredibly disappointing actually how often this happens. I can't count the amount of SO questions I've had to edit from others posting live API Keys for everything from custom services to AWS.
Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
51–60 of 258 posts
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
In history what have databases of people and state actor interests usually led to if any events are similar?
IIRC when Nazi Germany invaded Denmark in 1940, one of the first things the SS did was to send representatives to the local churches. In Denmark, every child was (I’m not sure if they still are actually?) registered at birth by the local parish in so called “church books”. With these “databases” in hand, the SS had a neat list of all names, and the approximate location of peoples homes. Those lists were used to ident…
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#53What do we do now? It seems the majority of people on the planet now have had some of their data leaked. Or are becoming ever more entangled with government and corporate systems which control and peddle their information as they see fit. Is it ultimately a big nothing burger, or is this some singularity we are passing through?
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Starting today, this will be known as "Shanghai'd credentials" and be reason #1 why we use ephemeral credentials (e.g. AWS STS/SSO) rather than static credentials (e.g. IAM Users)
Doesn't the client still need to know a long-lived secret (or a long-lived refresh token) in order to generate the ephemeral credentials?
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#55https://twitter.com/_KarenHao/status/1543949945614393344 (thread)
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of data may be made public to equalize, similarly to how real estate property rights or car registries may be public.
I would counter that, although it could, some groups will be able to evade it, effectively maintaining their advantage/power. Effectively averaging out the position of middle and lower classes, and lowering their chances of moving up the social ladder?
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#57Who would buy this? How could anyone possibly make money off this data set? I could understand if the Chinese government would pay for it to avoid embarrassment but making the sale public kinda voids that.
"Who would buy this?" Foreign intelligence agencies for classic espionage. If you want to do blackmailing in china, such a DB would be a good start. Otherwise, data brokers. Advertisement, financial credibility, trustworthines of buisness partners etc.
As for "data brokers. Advertisement, financial credibility, trustworthines of buisness partners etc.". Maybe. But these companies would turn themselves into criminals by using or purchasing this information.
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#58Earlier quoted context omitted.
In history what have databases of people and state actor interests usually led to if any events are similar?
I would say, impossible to compare. Digital changes the cost of acting upon this information, for good or bad purposes. Obvious comparisons to e.g. the Netherlands' famous over-registering of religion and how the Nazis abused that. But I feel this is long term potentially worse than that. Not in the level of horribleness, but in the effect on society moving forward.
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's incredibly disappointing actually how often this happens. I can't count the amount of SO questions I've had to edit from others posting live API Keys for everything from custom services to AWS.
When you do this is there a way to completely get rid of the information? Usually you can go back an look at the edit history to see the original post.
Re: Billion-record stolen Chinese database for sale on breach forum
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's incredibly disappointing actually how often this happens. I can't count the amount of SO questions I've had to edit from others posting live API Keys for everything from custom services to AWS.
When you do this is there a way to completely get rid of the information? Usually you can go back an look at the edit history to see the original post.
But as mentioned below - Still advised to change your keys for obvious reasons