Live data from Hacker News

WeatherKit

developer.apple.com

191–200 of 203 posts

Re: WeatherKit

#191
post #20

The Norwegian Meteorological Institute has an excellent free HTTP/JSON weather API that covers the globe. No signup required. https://developer.yr.no

Thank you, Is this only forecast? Is there anything like this which provides reliable historical data?

I think weather underground did i.e. until Apple gulped it.

Re: WeatherKit

#192
post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you in iOS 16 or iOS 15 - in iOS 15 the Weather Channel logo shows in all countries.

iOS 15 - interesting, assumed they’d only be attributing data they were actually using! Apple’s forecast does vary slightly from the ones the BBC (using MeteoGroup) and the Met Office give, so I’m not sure what their source is if it’s not the weather channel.

They use Dark Sky for some data points, even on iOS 15. But I believe the 10 day forecast is from the Weather Channel (which, to clarify, means weather.com)

Re: WeatherKit

#195

I always wondered how DarkSky got that "hyperlocal" weather data. After getting into amateur radio and learning about APRS, I'm thinking they used APRS weather beacons to obtain that data. If not, it sure would be good source for very localized weather in an app.

https://darksky.net/attribution

Re: WeatherKit

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apples’ “privacy” is that they retain monopoly control over my data. That's a strange way to describe the situation where Apple is not allowing third parties to share your private data without your permission. Apple is doing exactly what you wanted in your first paragraph, which is to let you decide who gets access to your private data. If you only give it to Apple, that's YOU deciding to voluntarily grant Apple th…

> You think it'd be better if Apple were giving your data to other companies so more companies could spy on you? No, I think it would be better if Apple stopped spying on me at all, full stop.

The complaint was that Apple was supposedly spying with exclusivity, i.e. not allowing others to spy on you.

And regardless, if you don’t like it, the solution is entirely within your grasp. After all, there’s no law forcing you to reveal your private self to Apple.

Re: WeatherKit

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Apples’ “privacy” is that they retain monopoly control over my data. That's a strange way to describe the situation where Apple is not allowing third parties to share your private data without your permission. Apple is doing exactly what you wanted in your first paragraph, which is to let you decide who gets access to your private data. If you only give it to Apple, that's YOU deciding to voluntarily grant Apple th…

The point is that there's no option where nobody gets to spy on me. I should have the option to host the server-side software myself, and/or delegate that to a third party of my choosing which provides a standardized API. Calling what Apple does "privacy" is a sleight of hand. True privacy means my data is mine, I am not forced to share it with whatever random employees of a multinational corporation happen to be abl…

Don’t use iCloud and all your wishes are granted. You can use non-iCloud services for email, calendars, contacts etc. It’s true that you won’t get the full iCloud experience of course, but any such complaint is invalid—you can’t have your cake and eat it too, as the saying goes.

Re: WeatherKit

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Seems like a win/win when the customers and businesses interests align. No one is pretending Apple is a charity. Of course they do all this for obscene amounts of profit. But if we get stronger privacy as a side effect, I think that’s a generally okay situation.

We're selling our freedoms for a sense of security. Apple is almost too big to defeat. With the flip of a switch, they could turn course. (I would argue in many senses that they have.) They're already obeying local governments as a central point of censorship and control. Even the FBI/NSA has them monitoring the files on your device. Apple is too many functions wrapped up as a single legal entity. They have too much…

"Even the FBI/NSA has them monitoring the files on your device."

Source?

Re: WeatherKit

#199
post #42
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are all kinds of potential performance benefits to a native SDK. Cross app caching for such common data could be a huge boon for watchOS complications & Home/Lock Screen widgets, for instance. No idea if they are implementing those kinds of enhancements but it’s no surprise that a native SDK would be provided. Also, how would they implement the privacy preserving black box location implementation with a REST AP…

> Cross app caching for such common data could be a huge boon for watchOS complications.. What is your differentiation criteria between anticipating a "huge" boon versus a "regular" or "modest" boon"?

What's your differentiation criteria for whether a comment is worth posting or not?

Re: WeatherKit

#200
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Cross app caching for such common data could be a huge boon for watchOS complications.. What is your differentiation criteria between anticipating a "huge" boon versus a "regular" or "modest" boon"?

What's your differentiation criteria for whether a comment is worth posting or not?

Whenever there's a bj in the username, I definitely go for it!

Would you like to know more? If so just shoot me an email.

Post reply on HN