Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
1–10 of 438 posts
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#2Please don't flag it this time. Folks deserve the option to at least be aware of it and decide for themselves if they wish to pursue it.
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#3HTTP-only makes me weary of visiting a self-professed piracy site.
They couldn't even spring for a Let's Encrypt cert?
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#4It's really funny to think about how the advances of technology keeps changing how we perceive books.
7TB is even a commodity disk these days. And it's a lot less than the torrent of scientific papers that floated around some time ago (that was ~18TB IIRC).
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#5I wonder if there are any search engines dedicated to indexing these kinds of libraries. I know there's a decent one just for scihub, but it would be awesome if I could do a Google-style search that returned the contents of books, magazines and journal articles instead of just websites.
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#6Please don't flag it this time. Folks deserve the option to at least be aware of it and decide for themselves if they wish to pursue it.
No post body was provided.
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#7HTTP-only makes me weary of visiting a self-professed piracy site. They couldn't even spring for a Let's Encrypt cert?
It's a read only blog with 2 pages. What do you gain for putting this over HTTPS?
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#8Your movie recommendations suck, ValentineC ;)
Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#9Re: Pirate Library Mirror: Preserving 7TB of books (that are not in Libgen)
#10HTTP-only makes me weary of visiting a self-professed piracy site. They couldn't even spring for a Let's Encrypt cert?
It's a read only blog with 2 pages. What do you gain for putting this over HTTPS?
Do you really want your ISP to know which piracy sites you frequent? This is all being sent in plain text. Or they could change the content, insert a redirect, or inject ads without your knowledge. TLS is needed on all websites - not just those with interaction.