Live data from Hacker News

40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

google.com

21–30 of 353 posts

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#21
post #3

Are there any advantages to IPv6 other than more addresses ?

I just hope ipv6 doesn't have privacy nightmare that 1 device will always get 1 IP. Currently, the isp I use provides dynamic ip, so on every router restart my ip gets changed. If they starts to provide ipv6, I hope they give options to rotate it frequently, so toxic companies like meta, facebook, microsoft can't connect my device & ip.

IPV6 is sort of like the new MAC address hardware identifier. An IP for every atom in the universe!

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I just hope ipv6 doesn't have privacy nightmare that 1 device will always get 1 IP. Currently, the isp I use provides dynamic ip, so on every router restart my ip gets changed. If they starts to provide ipv6, I hope they give options to rotate it frequently, so toxic companies like meta, facebook, microsoft can't connect my device & ip.

With IPv6 each device getting a unique IP is not a bug but a feature -- what will probably happen is that your ISP will lend out a /64 range to you, which your devices will use to assign a unique IP to themselves. This completely removes the need for NAT (also, keep in mind that a NAT is not a firewall or a security feature). BTW, dynamic IP rotation was never a guarantee and is only used because the pool of IPs were…

While I understand the sentiment, NAT does so much to protect most users, it should be considered a security feature.

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#25
post #2

Anyone go out of their way to disable IPV6 on all their systems, even at the hardware level, like on routers etc? What's a good reason to avoid IPV6?

Yes I turn it off because it's always causing unpredictable problems. I actually tried to switch to all IPv6 and that was worse than ipv4 because you still need to run a full ipv4 stock to visit almost anything on the web without a proxy

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#27
post #14

Why can't we paste aan ipv6 address into the browser address bar and have it go to that address? I'm forced to open [long brackets ] and the it works. Why!???? Ipv4 address just works without the hitch

Because of colons. Colons separate the different sections of an ipv6 address but HTTP URLs also use colons for the port, so the ipv6 IP must be encompassed in brackets to differentiate between IP and port.

is there "no" to automatically append brackets? like we do with ctrl+enter?

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With IPv6 each device getting a unique IP is not a bug but a feature -- what will probably happen is that your ISP will lend out a /64 range to you, which your devices will use to assign a unique IP to themselves. This completely removes the need for NAT (also, keep in mind that a NAT is not a firewall or a security feature). BTW, dynamic IP rotation was never a guarantee and is only used because the pool of IPs were…

While I understand the sentiment, NAT does so much to protect most users, it should be considered a security feature.

You can still set up inbound firewall on IPv6, my ISP does it (to my annoyance).

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With IPv6 each device getting a unique IP is not a bug but a feature -- what will probably happen is that your ISP will lend out a /64 range to you, which your devices will use to assign a unique IP to themselves. This completely removes the need for NAT (also, keep in mind that a NAT is not a firewall or a security feature). BTW, dynamic IP rotation was never a guarantee and is only used because the pool of IPs were…

While I understand the sentiment, NAT does so much to protect most users, it should be considered a security feature.

NAT itself doesn't provide any protection at all. You can set up NAT in dozens of different configurations (1:1 NAT comes to mind), but in the way consumer routers generally set up NAT, I can see why you'd say that (despite there being standard ways to forward ports without any user intervention such as uPnP). There's nothing "secure" about NAT.

Re: 40% of Google users now connect via IPv6

#30

Why can't we paste aan ipv6 address into the browser address bar and have it go to that address? I'm forced to open [long brackets ] and the it works. Why!???? Ipv4 address just works without the hitch

Is "2001::0:8080" 2001::0 port 8080, or 2001::0:8080 port 80? There you go. Of course you can argue for automatic conversion when there's no ambiguity.
Post reply on HN