Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
motionmountain.net
Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
#2Re: Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
#3In nature, the maximum power value c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W cannot be exceeded, as stated by Sciama in 1973. Still not much known, the value limits the power of explosions, the luminosity of stars and that of merging black holes. It is also a simple summary of general relativity.
But could someone please explain a little? If I have a widget that does c⁵/4G watts of work when I turn it on, what happens when I turn on a second one? Nothing? Distance between widgets doesn't matter?
Re: Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
#4In nature, the maximum power value c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W cannot be exceeded, as stated by Sciama in 1973. Still not much known, the value limits the power of explosions, the luminosity of stars and that of merging black holes. It is also a simple summary of general relativity.
In this house we obey the law of general relativity and forces over c⁵/4G will not be tolerated. But could someone please explain a little? If I have a widget that does c⁵/4G watts of work when I turn it on, what happens when I turn on a second one? Nothing? Distance between widgets doesn't matter?
Re: Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
In this house we obey the law of general relativity and forces over c⁵/4G will not be tolerated. But could someone please explain a little? If I have a widget that does c⁵/4G watts of work when I turn it on, what happens when I turn on a second one? Nothing? Distance between widgets doesn't matter?
If you try to produce more power than c⁵/4G at a single point, a black hole horizon appears and will make exceeding the limit impossible.
Re: Maximum Power in Nature: c⁵/4G ≈ 9 ⋅ 10⁵¹ W
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you try to produce more power than c⁵/4G at a single point, a black hole horizon appears and will make exceeding the limit impossible.
So that's a limit on power per cubic planck, and you can do it again if you shift one planck over?