ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
1–10 of 79 posts
Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#2Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#3Original Vice News story: https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj8xbq/police-are-telling-sh...
Previous discussion of above story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27959755
Previous related discussion: "A man spent a year in jail on murder charge that hinged on disputed AI evidence": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28264686
Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#4Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#5Quoted post unavailable.
Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#6Quoted post unavailable.
Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#7Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#8Direct link to ruling: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22077446-shotspotter... Original Vice News story: https://www.vice.com/en/article/qj8xbq/police-are-telling-sh... Previous discussion of above story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27959755 Previous related discussion: "A man spent a year in jail on murder charge that hinged on disputed AI evidence": https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28264686
https://shotspottercomplaint.com/gallery/20211011%20ShotSpot...
This provides some interesting background on the company (obviously biased)
Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#9Re: ShotSpotter defamation lawsuit against Vice has been dismissed
#10> On April 1, 2016, the ShotSpotter sensors picked up several audio bursts from a northwest Rochester neighborhood. Unable through its algorithms to detect a specific location, the system did not alert 911 or police. The system also thought the sounds to be the whirring blades of a helicopter, and not gunfire.
> Police notified ShotSpotter of the shooting, and the company revisited the audio from the scene. The analysts at first thought there were three shots, then changed to number to four, then five. Analysts found the fifth shot after a prosecution request to review the audio again, prosecutors say.
Never any evidence he fired a shot. They needed the fifth shot “found” because the cop shot four times, so magically it was!
Reuters did a more detailed expose later: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-poli...