Do you think there's an opportunity for a new RSS reader to emerge? And be financially successful, without the BS of ads, etc?
Goodbye, Feedly
51–60 of 201 posts
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#52Growth vs. value, development vs. maintenance, innovation vs. operations. It really seems like a lot of projects should embrace the the path of becoming a stable product: Charging 10 USD a year, assigning a single person to a comfy job of maintaining the app without adding new features. Just maintaining infrastructure, updating packages, and doing the occasional exchange of stack when old technologies are deprecated.…
What you’re describing is a kind of anti growth public service. Sounds nice!
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#53Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#54One of the features of Pro is that they'll pull the feeds you're subscribed to at a higher frequency. I think this is an example of doing freemium well!
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#55Every once in a while I think of unsubscribing to a feed and it is a bit of an adventure, but that is my only complaint.
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#56NetNewsWire user here. It’s very good. Would love one running on Linux natively.
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#57Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#58Of course it clashes with being a simple RSS reader for the author. This is just mismatched expectations, not Feedly getting worse.
Re: Goodbye, Feedly
#59This writer is really entitled. It is a free tier for a service that costs money to host and maintain. Of course there are upgrade prompts. I use Feedly (free) as a hosting service, and Reeder or one of the other many great RSS client apps as the frontend to it, so I don’t have to see the feedly interface.But the Feedly API I use constantly and it is extremely solid. That’s part of the greatness of RSS services. If t…