Vitamin D deficiency is far riskier for sedatory indoor people then skin cancer is. I wouldn’t be surprised if we look back at this time and laugh at how we were blocking too many UV rays.
One of those seems far more dangerous. And not treatable with I single pill.
Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
161–170 of 201 posts
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe part of that is that there's not much sun there so sunscreen is a niche product not a staple?
The opposite actually. Having a high latitude, summers are more intense.
Is it because people are mostly vertical when they are in the sun?
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#163Thalidomide still casts a huge shadow across the FDA: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/woman-who-stoo... It is the founding myth. As such it is institutionally very conservative about approving stuff. Now the question does become: what is the opportunity cost of that stance. How many people have died or had bad outcomes because medicine deemed safe in Europe was not approved by the FDA.
> It is the founding myth It’s not a myth and not involved in the FDA’s founding, so that statement makes no sense.
Substitute "an important event in the history of" if you are confused.
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Tanning beds are much more common. I think they were common, say 80's/90's, but I don't see them much anymore. I remember meeting a woman once - early 20's and very attractive - except her skin was extremely wrinkled. She told me her parents had owned a tanning salon and she used it all the time. and a bit later that's how things ended up.
> early 20's > extremely wrinkled Do you know if she also smoked cigarettes? In the past I have noticed early twenty’s with abnormally wrinkled skin from years of smoking.
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quoted post unavailable.
I'd posit that certain lobes were already shut off if you're unable to read a thread by the then-Commissioner of the FDA because it happens to be on Twitter. It's the 2020s, agency heads make official statements on Twitter all the time.
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#166> At 36, I am just old enough to remember when sunscreen wasn’t a big deal. My mom, despite being among the palest people alive, does not remember bringing it on our earliest vacations, or hearing any mention of sun protection by our pediatrician. > Now SPF is ubiquitous. You can find it in lotions, sprays, gels, oils, powders, and implements that look like grade-school glue sticks, as well as infused into skin-care…
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps because so many sunscreens contain benzene, a known carcinogen: https://www.valisure.com/valisure-newsroom/valisure-detects-...
Why is this being downvoted so heavily? Is this a known conspiracy theory? Does anyone have evidence to the contrary? Or a secondary source for the allegation?
https://www.consumerreports.org/toxic-chemicals-substances/b...
They didn't find it in their testing, but noted recalls.
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
At 42 I remember the pre-sunscreen days as well. At the beginning of summer we would all go to the pool and get a nasty burn. Within a week we were at the pool all day every day and would not have a burn again until the next year. On average we would be getting around 3 painful but not serious burns per year (one at the start of summer, one when we went to the amusement park, one when we went out on a boat or somethi…
I'm not sure where you guys grew up, but I'm 46 and remember putting on sunscreen as a kid, as did most of my friends. Even with sunscreens (which sometimes you forget to refresh...) you occasionally would get a nasty sunburn. On the other hand i remember being in Australia and all the British tourists would follow the strategy you layed out. So after the first day on a boat trip they all looked like xcooked lobsters…
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other wild portion of this is that if you go to northern EU (Norway/Sweden/Finland) sunscreen is like, insanely expensive. Like at least triple the price of what you would pay in the states for the same product.
That's crazy, especially because sunscreen in the us is absurdly expensive. $30 for a 8oz tube is borderline criminal.
Re: Newer, better sunscreens have not been approved by the FDA
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
The other wild portion of this is that if you go to northern EU (Norway/Sweden/Finland) sunscreen is like, insanely expensive. Like at least triple the price of what you would pay in the states for the same product.
Didn't they ban all the chemicals that are easily washed off and hurt the natural environment?