Live data from Hacker News

Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed?

nytimes.com

41–42 of 42 posts

Re: Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed?

#41
post #21
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solaris x86 vs RHEL is a no-brainer from a budgetary perspective.

Forgive my ignorance, but I haven't done the pricing for both. How do they work out?

RHEL is shockingly expensive for what you get. Either you do what they approve (in which case you won't really need their support, so you might as well be using CentOS) or you don't (in which case you won't get any support, so you might as well be using CentOS). But RH has the mindshare among developers; if you need to run something like Oracle on x86 then your options are RHEL or Windows.

Solx86 is free and of very high quality (far better than RHEL in package management alone!). But application vendors (e.g. again, Oracle) treat it as a tier-2 platform. So in many cases, it's just not an option.

Re: Is Sun Solaris on its deathbed?

#42
post #13

Linux vs. Solaris - Linux: Seg-fault in the gcc toolchain. After casting about for several days, we couldn't even find someone willing to take our money to fix it. Digging into the code (ld), it's so cryptic it may as well be written in undocumented assembler. Responses from mailing lists and forums: "Go back to Windows" "Restructure your project to avoid that problem" "Why are you complaining, fix it yourself, it's…

With open source software, we know WHAT is wrong and WHY it is wrong. We may not know HOW to fix it.

This is not true with closed source proprietary software.

Post reply on HN