The behind the scenes video shows details of the process. I found it fascinating: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIH4MJAC2Tg
I can think of many ways how to make this whole process much much easier. The amount of unnecessary work they did is just insane.
Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
11–20 of 104 posts
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#12Not to detract from it, but is the 1,357 hours combined man-hours, or start-to-finish hours?
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#13The fact that they had to finish shooting the whole thing to have something worth showing makes this even more impressive. They couldn't just stop halfway through and say good enough. For nearly two years they kept working on it and she couldn't really put on any weight, couldn't really age too much, etc. It really is dedication!
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#14The reason is because of how this post got on the front page of Hacker News.In normal circumstances I can bet that this post maybe would get like three votes in five hours.But in this case the poster is "swombat" who has a huge following on twitter and a lot of them are hnusers.I noticed an instant upsurge in votes after he posted this on his twitter page.
Another reason is because "swombat" himself is also one of the top Hacker News users and when people see his name there chances of upvoting increases significantly.This I think is actually fair and he probably deserves a little more attention than the average hnuser.But what I vehemently object to is the use of twitter to gain traction.
Here are some possible solutions that I can think of.
1) If a post gets a lot of traffic from twitter and other such social media websites ,it should work against it in the rank calculation algorithm.
2) Users be advised to not use their twitter or facebook following to gain traction on HackerNews.
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#15http://indigitalmarketing.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/digg-help...
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#16Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#17No MVP here - they went all the way the first time. Be sure to switch to 1080p and go full screen, it's breathtaking. But it makes me wonder, what is the ROI on this? Will they really make back the wages of 30 people for 22 months, and how long will it take?
The ROI is creating something incredible that you can be proud of forever. This is art! I hope people will always have the courage to create amazing things without worrying about the financials.
Which is roughly 62 hours a month.
Even if the people were being paid $50/hour, which is unlikely considering I assume most of them will be volunteers, that comes out to about $50,000.
They said they used 288,000 jelly beans. There is roughly 400 jelly beans per pound. You can buy bulk jelly beans for $85 for 10lbs.
Which comes out to $61,200 for the jelly beans. I'm sure they could get a non-name brand or bulk discount so it could be much less.
So definitely less $100,000 for the music video.
They can make that money back pretty quickly if they become a YouTube partner and the video goes viral. They would only need about 50million views to pay back the costs of making the video.
Plus, how can you put a price on art?
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#18See this post is a testament to Hacker News's decline.Not because I think that post doesnt have something interesting or intellectually arousing to say.It absolutely does.I create things too and I understand the importance of creation especially when it takes two years to make something. The reason is because of how this post got on the front page of Hacker News.In normal circumstances I can bet that this post maybe…
EDIT: Okay I get it.
From HN Guidelines
"If your account is less than a year old, please don't submit comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. (It's a common semi-noob illusion.)"
Sorry I was not aware of that.
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#19No MVP here - they went all the way the first time. Be sure to switch to 1080p and go full screen, it's breathtaking. But it makes me wonder, what is the ROI on this? Will they really make back the wages of 30 people for 22 months, and how long will it take?
The actual people moving the jelly beans into position were, according to the making-of video, unpaid. Music is like video games, movies, journalism, political campaigns, etc: grunt work gets done by an undercaste of young people "paying their dues" with the promise that they will be allowed to graduate to the interesting, high status stuff if they just stick with it a little while longer. (This is a lie.)
Re: Stop motion video shot over 2 years with 288,000 jelly beans
#20The behind the scenes video shows details of the process. I found it fascinating: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIH4MJAC2Tg
I can think of many ways how to make this whole process much much easier. The amount of unnecessary work they did is just insane.