One of the most Hacker News articles ever written. A bad solution (wearing a choker) to a self-generated problem (using Arch) that costs a lot of money. In summary: this generates more problems than it solves (unless you're a navy seal).
Why don't more people use throat mics?
151–160 of 285 posts
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#152One of the most Hacker News articles ever written. A bad solution (wearing a choker) to a self-generated problem (using Arch) that costs a lot of money. In summary: this generates more problems than it solves (unless you're a navy seal).
>a self-generated problem (using Arch)
I would argue this is a good solution to the problem of using Windows or Mac. ;)
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#153I should write up my solution using a parabolic dish that focuses sound from a relatively small zone where my head (usually) is, into a good cheap mic. You get good isolation (even from keyboard sounds) requires nothing on your head or throat, and ... physics! (You just need to accept a big dish in your field of view, and you also can't pace, walk around, as with bluetooth solutions.)
How does this compare against the more mainstream shotgun mic?
Antlion and Sennheiser make good passive rejection mics.
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#154I should write up my solution using a parabolic dish that focuses sound from a relatively small zone where my head (usually) is, into a good cheap mic. You get good isolation (even from keyboard sounds) requires nothing on your head or throat, and ... physics! (You just need to accept a big dish in your field of view, and you also can't pace, walk around, as with bluetooth solutions.)
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#155Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the most Hacker News comments every written. A dismissive comment about a diy home project because you'd rather be critical of someone else than build something yourself.
I think this is a reaction to the tone set by the headline, which seems to ask "why don't people use this far more cumbersome alternative?" That said, the assessment of pros and cons in the article is less stereotypically oblivious and more nuanced than the above would suggest.
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
It would be nice if we could keep this kind of low-effort, Facebook-esque fluff out of Hacker News.
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#157Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#158Do they? The audio sample sounds a lot worse than the high quality standalone mics. Does he mean something else?
Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#159Re: Why don't more people use throat mics?
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the most Hacker News comments every written. A dismissive comment about a diy home project because you'd rather be critical of someone else than build something yourself.
I think this is a reaction to the tone set by the headline, which seems to ask "why don't people use this far more cumbersome alternative?" That said, the assessment of pros and cons in the article is less stereotypically oblivious and more nuanced than the above would suggest.