Live data from Hacker News

Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

youtube.com

151–158 of 158 posts

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#151
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Ignorant) English people absolutely make jokes about the French being militarily incompetent and prone to surrender, in the face of significant evidence[0] - "France is the most successful military power in history". Source: am English, am attempting to become decreasingly ignorant over time. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_France EDIT: Wait, crap, I forgot Brexit. I guess your statement remain…

Claiming its the most successful in history is nonsense. France was the most populated and richest country in Europe for a very long time. Despite this, what one could consider natural French territory, Belgium and Netherland France never managed to hold for a significant amount of time. And then they decisively lost the global great power struggle against Britain despite France being much richer and having larger po…

> Despite this, what one could consider natural French territory, Belgium and Netherland

What's natural about this? Those countries had been fendong off occupyers for centuries by the time the French made any serious progress during Napoleon. If you're refering to the Rhine/Maas delta, after the Roman empire it never was a (significant) border again, at least not in the Netherlands.

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#152

Earlier quoted context omitted.

France lost an awful lot of men in WW1, however they could not do it alone. The allies almost lost the war with the Ludendorf offensive in spring 1918, however the USA saved the day when the expeditionary force got to two million soldiers in the summer of 1918.

> The allies almost lost the war with the Ludendorf offensive in spring 1918 Not really. Those offensive were very unlikely to win the war. They look more impressive on a map then in reality. He really had no strategic plan, its was basically 'Lets attack and hope for the best'.

It was a big deal for Germany, they moved their troops from the eastern front after the Brest-Litovsk treaty, and they sold it as the 'last big push' to their troops. Part of the original plan was to first win in the west, in order to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time.

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#154
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Myself and my then GF visited Arras just north of Verdun in 2019. She was a few months pregnant at that stage and in every hotel we stayed, the proprietor warned her to only drink bottled water, including for brushing teeth. The locality got so hammered with poison gas shells, it all seeped into the ground water making it mildly poisonous!! Lovely part of the world, but a sad legacy of military buildups.

What about non-pregnant people?

I'd say it's probably a red flag for non-pregnant folks too.

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#155
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about non-pregnant people?

It is an honest question. Is the poison bad for others or only because a pregnant woman or the foetus are exceptionally weak to it? If it is, why and how do people still live there?

Again, I'm guessing that pregnancy is probably a health condition where everything is under stress, and drinking toxin laced tap water doesn't help.

But lots of people do live there, and from albeit biased observation, they seem happy enough just drinking beer and wine (and maybe bottled water).

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#156
post #60
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>well, except for Lego Star Wars of course Until you watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WmLmPYvrMA

Watching this makes me feel ill, and it has nothing to do with the content. Seriously, were they holding a phone in their hand while moving minis around?

Lol. I actually created it. Sorry for the undisclosed self-promotion.

I made this when I was 14. Yeah, camera stability was a major problem for me in pretty much all my videos, and this one is especially bad.

I'm trying to remember exactly what I did over half my lifetime ago... This was made with a point and shoot camera. I think the 2nd shot was indeed me holding the camera with my hand. I don't think there's any actual character movement there though, so that shot didn't involve me moving the characters. I had the actual Episode 3 up and was going through it frame by frame trying to replicate the scene with the same camera angles and possibly camera movement. I think simply setting the camera on the table wouldn't have given me the angles I wanted. There was no tripod short enough to get the camera as low to the table as necessary. I would need cutouts in the set's floor for the camera, requiring multiple sets or a set that can be broken into different pieces. That was too complicated for me and I'm not even sure if I had a tripod at that time.

For the 1st shot, it looks like the camera is sitting on top of something (maybe a book) because its elevation seems constant. Its angle though is quite erratic, so I think I was tilting it down with my hand because simply setting it flat on the book wasn't giving the necessary downward angle.

For the last shot, I think the camera was sitting level on the table. This shot is the most stable, but is still pretty shaky. The camera had a shutter button that required a fair amount of force to press. Every time I pressed it there was a large chance that it would move the camera. Also it was a crowded set. Sticking my hands in there to move the characters often resulted in me bumping the camera.

For the 3rd shot, possibly the camera was also sitting on something.

Another problem is I think the camera was on autofocus, auto exposure, and auto whitebalance. So between each picture these settings could change, which also contributed to inconsistencies between frames. I don't even think that camera had the option of manual focus.

As I got better at stop motion, I started using a Logitech QuickCam Pro 9000 USB webcam attached to my laptop. That allowed me to trigger a frame by pressing a key on my keyboard, which wouldn't shake the camera. I also then enabled manual focus, exposure, and whitebalance, and could use onion skinning. The camera also had hinges allowing the height and vertical angle to be adjusted easily. I focused more on keeping the camera steady, by building a LEGO cage around it, and trying to avoid bumping it while moving the characters.

I didn't have a cell phone at the time. I think I got my first phone a year and a half after this video. It was a feature phone and I think its picture quality was a lot worse than this point and shoot's quality or that of the QuickCam. I never thought about using it for stop motion; that would have been worse than this.

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The allies almost lost the war with the Ludendorf offensive in spring 1918 Not really. Those offensive were very unlikely to win the war. They look more impressive on a map then in reality. He really had no strategic plan, its was basically 'Lets attack and hope for the best'.

It was a big deal for Germany, they moved their troops from the eastern front after the Brest-Litovsk treaty, and they sold it as the 'last big push' to their troops. Part of the original plan was to first win in the west, in order to avoid fighting a war on two fronts at the same time.

They basically took all their best troops and pushed them into one relentless offensive after another destroying all their best troops.

Re: Lego Battle of Verdun [video]

#158
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Claiming its the most successful in history is nonsense. France was the most populated and richest country in Europe for a very long time. Despite this, what one could consider natural French territory, Belgium and Netherland France never managed to hold for a significant amount of time. And then they decisively lost the global great power struggle against Britain despite France being much richer and having larger po…

> Despite this, what one could consider natural French territory, Belgium and Netherland What's natural about this? Those countries had been fendong off occupyers for centuries by the time the French made any serious progress during Napoleon. If you're refering to the Rhine/Maas delta, after the Roman empire it never was a (significant) border again, at least not in the Netherlands.

> What's natural about this?

Where is the center of power of the French crown? And then measure how far away the lowlands are.

The French kings have been struggling to control Flanders for literally more the 1000 years.

Given how much larger and richer France was, and how incredibly valuable that land is, the most successful military in history should have managed it.

> Those countries had been fendong off occupyers for centuries

Yes but if they had been opposed by the best military in history then they shouldn't have been able to.

Post reply on HN