Live data from Hacker News

The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

fastcompany.com

301–310 of 330 posts

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#301
post #300
post #298

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> You are making personal attacks saying Ive has made many mistakes That's not a personal attack. > you have already made up your mind that whatever he does is a mistake Uh, no. As I said, good luck with that.

If you were being interviewed for jury selection for case against Ive, you would not be selected because of your bias against Ive. As I said, Good luck understanding nuance in the future.

Jury selection, uh? Your line of argumentation is now surreal.

Good luck, and good bye.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#302
post #301
post #300

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you were being interviewed for jury selection for case against Ive, you would not be selected because of your bias against Ive. As I said, Good luck understanding nuance in the future.

Jury selection, uh? Your line of argumentation is now surreal. Good luck, and good bye.

It appears surreal to you because you are in some kind of obsession against Ive. That is not healthy.

Good luck to you too, you do need it.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#303
post #302
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Jury selection, uh? Your line of argumentation is now surreal. Good luck, and good bye.

It appears surreal to you because you are in some kind of obsession against Ive. That is not healthy. Good luck to you too, you do need it.

I find it funny that you complained about personal attacks yet the only one here engaging in personal attacks is you.

You also seem obsessed with Ive.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#304
post #303
post #302

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It appears surreal to you because you are in some kind of obsession against Ive. That is not healthy. Good luck to you too, you do need it.

I find it funny that you complained about personal attacks yet the only one here engaging in personal attacks is you. You also seem obsessed with Ive.

I find it funny that you cannot just let go even though you said goodbye, that should tell you who is obsessed with Ive.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#305
post #304
post #303

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it funny that you complained about personal attacks yet the only one here engaging in personal attacks is you. You also seem obsessed with Ive.

I find it funny that you cannot just let go even though you said goodbye, that should tell you who is obsessed with Ive.

Well, likewise for you, isn't it?

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#306
post #305
post #304

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it funny that you cannot just let go even though you said goodbye, that should tell you who is obsessed with Ive.

Well, likewise for you, isn't it?

You were the one who said good bye, not me.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#308
post #307
post #306

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You were the one who said good bye, not me.

But you do have some sort of fixation, wouldn't you agree?

Again it was you who said goodbye yet because of your obsession you are still continuing this conversation.

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#309
post #308
post #307

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But you do have some sort of fixation, wouldn't you agree?

Again it was you who said goodbye yet because of your obsession you are still continuing this conversation.

It takes two to tango, doesn't it?

What does it say about your obsession that you're continuing this thread?

Re: The dissolution of Apple’s legacy design team

#310
post #309
post #308

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Again it was you who said goodbye yet because of your obsession you are still continuing this conversation.

It takes two to tango, doesn't it? What does it say about your obsession that you're continuing this thread?

I didnt say goodbye, you did.
Post reply on HN