Live data from Hacker News

“Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

medium.com

21–30 of 243 posts

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#21
post #3

Not the least surprised. By accepting the EULA and using the service free of monetary charge, you are instead paying with the contents of your e-mails and adress-book.

Another reason to run your own email server

How would you prevent recipients from using Outlook?

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#23
post #8

There's a difference between adding the URLs to search engine results and accessing the URLs to scan for malware. The latter is quite common, lots of email hosts do that. It's not clear to me from the post if the former is actually happening - the author doesn't state that they found the links in Bing's results, just that they were accessed by BingBot.

I found them in Bing results

Are the URLs being served with a “noindex” header? Blocking crawls with robots.txt cannot de-list items from Google or other search engines.

> Warning: Don't use a robots.txt file as a means to hide your web pages from Google search results. If other pages point to your page with descriptive text, Google could still index the URL without visiting the page. If you want to block your page from search results, use another method such as password protection or noindex.

From https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/robots/in...

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup this is true - I was just being lazy. But what surprised me was that Bing actually indexed them. (even though my robots.txt said not to)

Can you prove that by linking to a Bing search where one of your pages show up ?

yeh...

https://www.bing.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fshoprocket.io%2F...

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#26

Isn't this just the "link preview" feature, that is enabled by default in outlook? Many email clients generate link previews so that they can display a thumbnail of the webpage. Would seem to be necessary to filter out those referrers from the validate link

Essentially yes - but "previewing" link and sending that link to Bingbot to crawl and index is another matter. Imagine you send someone a "private" link to a file...Bing sees that and indexes it for the world to see. Not cool.

“Private links” should be covered by robots.txt. The only case I see this happening is for those “anyone with link” shares and those are easy to cover.

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#28
post #8

There's a difference between adding the URLs to search engine results and accessing the URLs to scan for malware. The latter is quite common, lots of email hosts do that. It's not clear to me from the post if the former is actually happening - the author doesn't state that they found the links in Bing's results, just that they were accessed by BingBot.

I found them in Bing results

That should be clearer in the article. It's not evident from the SO question or from what you've actually written. A screenshot of those search results would go a long way towards making the article sound more credible.

Re: “Magic links” can end up in Bing search results, rendering them useless

#30
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I found them in Bing results

Are the URLs being served with a “noindex” header? Blocking crawls with robots.txt cannot de-list items from Google or other search engines. > Warning: Don't use a robots.txt file as a means to hide your web pages from Google search results. If other pages point to your page with descriptive text, Google could still index the URL without visiting the page. If you want to block your page from search results, use anoth…

They are now - I didn't think I had to as all the pages are naturally behind a login, it never crossed my mind that Bing would follow email links, let alone index them in search results.
Post reply on HN