Live data from Hacker News

‘Blade Runner’ at 40

esquire.com

211–220 of 435 posts

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#211

Mind-blowing art-direction/set-decorating/costumes when it came out. I have to make an excuse to get up though when Harrison Ford tries to play a nerdy fan in the Zhora character's dressing room. So bad.

That's because Deckard is lying to her (poorly). Remember, he's not that good of a detective. They use him because he's willing to do dirty work and is expendable.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#212
post #23

The visual language Bladerunner invented has virtually defined SciFi for the past 40 years. If you enjoy it's worth digging into the work Syd Mead - the film's concept artist - created: https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5642443624/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5642443252/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5641873923/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_…

Can anyone recommend some music that has the same vibe as Blade Runner's synth stuff?

The Hans Zimmer soundtrack to Blade Runner 2049 is quite good. It plays homage to the original, but is definitely its own creation.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#213
Blade Runner is best viewed on the biggest screen you can get. First time I watched it was on VHS on a small CRT and I didn’t get it. Now, on the living room big screen, it’s immersive and sublime. A theatrical environment makes all the difference.

Same thing happened to me with Ghost in the Shell. I didn’t appreciate it until I saw it on a big screen.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#214

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Let's face it" - anyone who brings their preferences to the table as indisputable truths held by all reasonable, i.e. non "pretentious", folk, could probably do with some long expository chats with other film fans in a good cafe around the corner from a good cinema.

Opinions about movies aren't indisputable truths. There are things that are general truths though. Opinions held by such a high majority of people that such opinions are very close to the truth in the sense that often people talk about such opinions without using "speculative" adjectives. I would say the things that I talk about in my post belong to those "general truths." I would also say fans of Blade Runner don't…

So to summarize: you despise fans of the original Blade Runner because they so often view their own opinions as superior. And you see no irony in this. Got it.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#215
post #159
post #115

So, is Deckard a replicant?

Of course he is.

It's ambiguous in the film and far more interesting if he's not, as it becomes an interrogation of what makes us human, and forces us to accept our imperfection and that of our fellow man.

Well, besides that you know, the obvious implications for the rights of intelligent beings, natural or not, but since we won't have strong AI for a while and it wasn't about animal rights no matter how much you stretch it, we're left with questions about our own nature and how we relate to other humans.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are three things that are important to the movie. - Pacing so you don't get bored. - Thematic depth - Atmosphere A lot of pretentious people like to ignore pacing as if their brains are made up of pure IQ and anything related excitement is beneath them. Make no mistake, we are all human and we all get bored. Pacing is important and it takes a lot of effort (and intelligence) for a director to maintain that leve…

> comprehend why Blade runner even has the possibility of being boring then I'm likely too stupid to be communicating with you Step away from the sugar drinks and try a digital detox. :-) People paid to see Vangelis sound and light shows, when there wasn’t even a movie rolling. Surely with a movie attached, the sound and light isn’t that dull? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31437226 Buried in that thread is a p…

[flagged]

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can anyone recommend some music that has the same vibe as Blade Runner's synth stuff?

Kuedo's severant album has a very similar DNA. intense, sleek synth driven but still melancholic and familiar https://open.spotify.com/track/6tjTQ95h4TOHvB1VzhYvKJ?si=anq...

Not sure why you’re being downvoted; this album and the Kuedo alias in general wears the Blade Runner inspirations on the sleeve.

It’s not surprising he was tapped to help score the Blade Runner short film: https://ra.co/news/40000

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#218
post #23

The visual language Bladerunner invented has virtually defined SciFi for the past 40 years. If you enjoy it's worth digging into the work Syd Mead - the film's concept artist - created: https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5642443624/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5642443252/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_one/5641873923/in/... https://www.flickr.com/photos/x-ray_delta_…

There's an interesting interview with Syd Mead about his work on Blade Runner here: [1]

Mead also worked on Tron (among other films) and George Lucas made the AT-AT based on Mead's art.[2]

[1] - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6VPT-Ug-gF4

[2] - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syd_Mead

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#219
post #9

I am one of the 11 people on Earth that hates coffee. "Hate" isn't strong enough. Even "despises" I'm not sure goes far enough. It tastes disgusting to me. I can't even stand the smell. This has led me at times to wonder if I'm crazy or if everyone else is. I do notice a ton of people consume a ton of sugar in their coffee so it seems like many don't really like coffee. They like sugar. But I digresss. I have the sam…

So relieved I'm not alone in this. BR was top of my to-watch list after years of recommendations from friends, family, and the culture at large. And I finally sat down to watch it and it was downright bizarre. I read the book it's based on a few months prior and maybe that skewed my expectations. It was nothing at all like Dick's original story. The stakes were never explained and the visual language was incredibly g…

> Then again, I do think this is a case of the "if you'd only seen it at the time!"

I'm not sure about that. It definitely would have been more interesting if I saw it when it was novel, but the biggest fans of it always say I'll love it if I just watch cuts that came out a lot later.

Re: ‘Blade Runner’ at 40

#220
post #19

I hated that movie the first to I saw it. I was bored with it. Now I love it. I really enjoy how much time they spend establishing the atmosphere and characters. It all feels very real and has depth. I loath the speedy sci fi that tries to touch on atmosphere and then hurries along with their paper characters and so on. So much sci fi I encounter now feels little more than a long trailer with no idea how to end.

I saw it on opening day in 1982. I was pretty disappointed in it. But the original theatrical release was actually not good, and really did need the re-edits. Maybe not six re-edits, but still.
Post reply on HN