Earlier quoted context omitted.
But they're not robots - they've just outsourced the checkout job to the customer and made it so they require minimal training. Technology has made this easier, but it's not robotics.
There are too kinds of automatic: logic automation to replace worker training, and physical automation to replace worker movement. Self checkout is logic automation, making the checkout job easy enough that customer can be trusted to do it. Checkout used to have two jobs: a checker and a customer standing around waiting. Self-checkout merged those two jobs into one.
Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
61–70 of 75 posts
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#62Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#63I currently work at a small eocm business, the number of systems and integrations availble have gutted the typical career progression.
I am concerned at how to navigate from data entry clerk to CFO. This path was available historically, however, it is becomkng less-so.
Audit jobs are going too. Previously, a firm would need a big staff to check numbers. Now it's a lot easier to audit a process becuase the company uses SAP, Netsuite, or some other big name ERP.
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#64Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are too kinds of automatic: logic automation to replace worker training, and physical automation to replace worker movement. Self checkout is logic automation, making the checkout job easy enough that customer can be trusted to do it. Checkout used to have two jobs: a checker and a customer standing around waiting. Self-checkout merged those two jobs into one.
Three jobs in many instances actually. The bag boy would put the products into bags and possibly walk it out to your car.
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#66It allows a smaller workforce to handle the same or greater volume. A port that had 1000 longshoremen can be staffed with 100 people. That’s as much due to workflows adapting to new technology, the use of standardized containers, and scale as it is a robot that slots in 1:1 for a crane operator. Bank of America opened a virtual branch in my town. There’s two ATMs that let you video chat with a teller if needed.
Or the end product itself has been obsoleted by something more mechanized, computerized, or standardized. Computer files means no more file clerks. Email reduces demand for First Class letters and mailroom staff. Dedicated staff passing around external mail and interdepartmental envelopes with the prior recipient and sender crossed out is an anachronism. Direct deposit/ACH and debit cards reduce demand for payroll staff, bookkeepers, tellers, armored car services, and checkbook manufacturing. Even low end legal labor like document review has been automated.
Demand is elastic. When goods are factory made they become cheaper and people individually buy more and more people can afford to buy one.
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#67Ask your ATM. It replaced a real bank employee.
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#68Ask your ATM. It replaced a real bank employee.
My bank still has tellers. Also, I'm not sure that making your customer do the work instead of an employee is quite the same as automation. Would you consider the self checkout line at the grocery as automation? A human is still doing all the work, the difference is the store doesn't have to pay for the labor.
Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#69Re: Ask HN: What happened to robots taking all our jobs?
#70Robotics is only one way to achieve automation -- I wouldn't be obsessed with "robots" per se and insist it's not taking over.