Live data from Hacker News

Not future-proofing

kk.org

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: Not future-proofing

#11
Broadly agree, though getting a Mac five minutes before you need it isn't viable anymore given the two month backorder on many of them :-)

Just in time provisioning certainly worked a lot better pre 2020! Nowadays people are having to go to all sorts of odd lengths just to pick up a games console released 18 months ago..

Re: Not future-proofing

#12
In the mid 1990s when my parents were building their house, I absolutely could not understand why my dad had me spending the weekend pulling a cat5 cable and 2 coax cables through the studs. The coax ended up being a bad bet, by we got a LOT of value out of that cat5. Even with the advent of wireless much later, we still needed Ethernet to connect access points to the main router.

That was probably our only good bet, though, so I still agree with the punchline!

Re: Not future-proofing

#13
post #3

Even though I generally like the sentiment, replacing the cat-5 cable with a newer one should be a pretty fast task, and wired ethernet always is better than wireless.

I remember having to redo all the heads because we only connected 5 wires initially, but the next speed level needed all 8. Still, a few hours work for a 10x upgrade, so I couldn't complain!

Re: Not future-proofing

#14

Broadly agree, though getting a Mac five minutes before you need it isn't viable anymore given the two month backorder on many of them :-) Just in time provisioning certainly worked a lot better pre 2020! Nowadays people are having to go to all sorts of odd lengths just to pick up a games console released 18 months ago..

That was my thought as well since post is 23rd June 2022 - like author missed what is going on with a lot of stuff.

Re: Not future-proofing

#15
post #7

I like KK's work, but the first part of this article is weird. It's more of an argument for why you should leave pull strings in your empty conduit. That said, I agree with the idea of generally buying only what you need and buying it at the time you need it.

I agree, he seems to argue for conduit, making the house more configurable and thus better able to 'learn'.

Re: Not future-proofing

#17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agreed. Maybe there will be entangled particles in the future that get shot out down wires and then allow you to instantaneously communicate with people after you receive them. The right future oriented mindset in terms of building a house would be to make it easy to install wires. Or pipes. Or whatever. Just in time hardware is only useful if you have a place to put it. That’s the tricky part; trying to figure out h…

Uh. You can't shoot a particle down a wire. The electron that comes out the far end is not the same one that went in.

Darn, and here I thought he solved massively distributed quantum entanglement based networking in a one sentence throw away line on an internet forum

Re: Not future-proofing

#18
I ran the conduit vertically: from box in the room's wall down into the basement where it was just open. That made it easy to run whatever I wanted, and to change the wiring if needed.

I did have two conduits to the patch panel for each wing and a conduit connecting the two panels. But these ones weren't terminated by boxes, they were just open.

Re: Not future-proofing

#19
I found this part puzzling: "And the one place in my office I still use wires — my desktop — the existing cat5 ethernet cable was not fast enough for the new speeds of fiber optic."

What would fiber speeds be useful for in a home office? It seems like for most people, Ethernet would still be fine?

Re: Not future-proofing

#20

I found this part puzzling: "And the one place in my office I still use wires — my desktop — the existing cat5 ethernet cable was not fast enough for the new speeds of fiber optic." What would fiber speeds be useful for in a home office? It seems like for most people, Ethernet would still be fine?

10 gigabit still only needs cat 6A. 25 and 40 gigabit takes cat 8, (and only goes out to 30 meters) while 50 gigabit is fiber-only.

It's... physically possible Kevin is doing something that requires 50 gigabit, but he's certainly not doing it with a normal wifi setup.

Post reply on HN