This is consistent with decisions from the Austrian and French data protection authorities (DPAs). Note that Google is a Processor (for this product), meaning that Google itself does not violate GDPR, but only the websites that use it. Following the Schrems II case, the "threat model" used by EU courts on these matters is "American law enforcement can serve a warrant to American companies." Long story short, any proc…
> meaning that Google itself does not violate GDPR, but only the websites that use it. This is so baffling to me. Google has subsidiaries in the EU. The fact that it's ok to give a product to a EU client which can't be used in accordance with the law, and the client is responsible, is just idiotic.
Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
21–30 of 614 posts
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be compliant, Google can just set up data centers specific to GA in one of those EU subsidiaries, so GA admins can choose to have their visitors' data stored only in an EU data center (and promise to not transfer that data to the US). This wouldn't be that hard to do.
Building out the infrastructure necessary for Cloud to be compliant with region-stored data was a multi-year project. Huge swathes of Google's architecture (especially its legacy architecture) have deeply-ingrained location-agnosticism assumptions. It turns out to be extremely complex and expensive to remove those assumptions given the way Google handles data once it hits their datacenter fabric. (Not impossible, min…
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#23Italy is the 4th in a string of recent decisions across the EU. (We're tracking these cases on isgoogleanalyticsillegal.com along with details for each.) Note that it's not illegal to use GA entirely, just illegal to use in its default state which transmits PII to the US.
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#24To those companies and people who find these EU decisions baffling or inconvenient: tough. If you had had respect for your users this would not be an issue. You would already not be spying on them.
To website visitors: if you see a cookie banner, the site is asking permission to spy on you. If that concerns you, close the tab.
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#25This is consistent with decisions from the Austrian and French data protection authorities (DPAs). Note that Google is a Processor (for this product), meaning that Google itself does not violate GDPR, but only the websites that use it. Following the Schrems II case, the "threat model" used by EU courts on these matters is "American law enforcement can serve a warrant to American companies." Long story short, any proc…
> meaning that Google itself does not violate GDPR, but only the websites that use it. This is so baffling to me. Google has subsidiaries in the EU. The fact that it's ok to give a product to a EU client which can't be used in accordance with the law, and the client is responsible, is just idiotic.
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#26Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#27We are based in Europe and self-host our analytics exactly for this reason. I feel this is just the beginning.
Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#28Re: Italian watchdog bans use of Google Analytics
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
> meaning that Google itself does not violate GDPR, but only the websites that use it. This is so baffling to me. Google has subsidiaries in the EU. The fact that it's ok to give a product to a EU client which can't be used in accordance with the law, and the client is responsible, is just idiotic.
I don’t find it idiotic. It was the client’s decision to spy on its users. I have no sympathy for companies who make that decision.
Calling it spying is a little far-fetched I think, when the problem was the transfer ip addresses to US servers, not Analytics itself.