“Released”? What? Papers are published. Websites are published. Tools are “released.”
Where has Imagen been released?
11–20 of 104 posts
“Released”? What? Papers are published. Websites are published. Tools are “released.”
Where has Imagen been released?
Is this by a person that knows or is guessing?
Explanation linked from same page: https://www.assemblyai.com/blog/diffusion-models-for-machine...
If Google has something similar or better it definitely makes it look like OpenAI is wasting its time. None of this relates to AGI.
I don't think anyone is saying that humanity is close to AGI, but check out DeepMind's Gato work for a more well-rounded agent: https://www.deepmind.com/publications/a-generalist-agent
> Imagen, released just last month, can generate high-quality, high-resolution images given only a description of a scene “Released”? What? Papers are published. Websites are published. Tools are “released.” Where has Imagen been released?
> Imagen, released just last month, can generate high-quality, high-resolution images given only a description of a scene “Released”? What? Papers are published. Websites are published. Tools are “released.” Where has Imagen been released?
This implementation popped up on hacker news not too long ago. I got it working on Colab first, and then my own GPU at home. But just barely. Need more memory :) https://github.com/lucidrains/imagen-pytorch
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This implementation popped up on hacker news not too long ago. I got it working on Colab first, and then my own GPU at home. But just barely. Need more memory :) https://github.com/lucidrains/imagen-pytorch
Wait, so I can try this on Colab right now?
There's like 3 projects named DallE, and then the 2 real DallEs...frustrating.
"Meh, that's kinda cool? I guess?" or "What am I looking at?"..."Ok? So a computer made it? That seems neat"
To me I am still trying to get my jaw off the floor from 2 months ago. But the responses have been so muted and shoulder shrugging that I think either I am missing something or they are missing something. Even really drilling in, practically shaking them "DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS A ORIGINAL IMAGE CONSTRUCTED ENTIRELY BY AN AI?!?!" and people just seem to see it as a party trick at best.
I have shown imagen (and dalle2) to a number of people now (non-tech, just everyday friends, family, co-workers) and I have been pretty stunned by the response I get from most people: "Meh, that's kinda cool? I guess?" or "What am I looking at?"..."Ok? So a computer made it? That seems neat" To me I am still trying to get my jaw off the floor from 2 months ago. But the responses have been so muted and shoulder shrugg…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wait, so I can try this on Colab right now?
No, something that's been causing a lotta confusion in AI art is people stand up quick implementations generally matching the general description in the paper, but, they're not really investing in training them. Then people see "imagen-pytorch" on GitHub and get confused, either think it's Imagen itself or a suitable replica of it. There's like 3 projects named DallE, and then the 2 real DallEs...frustrating.
> Imagen, released just last month, can generate high-quality, high-resolution images given only a description of a scene “Released”? What? Papers are published. Websites are published. Tools are “released.” Where has Imagen been released?
This implementation popped up on hacker news not too long ago. I got it working on Colab first, and then my own GPU at home. But just barely. Need more memory :) https://github.com/lucidrains/imagen-pytorch
I really want to build services with these.