Live data from Hacker News

Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

neo.life

161–170 of 178 posts

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#161

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So you just shifted the goal posts, huh? First you cared about killing a sentient being, now you care about their suffering . And why is this any better? You only care about animal suffering because you are an animal who can suffer yourself. Your ideology remains selfish an self-centered. You don't care about killing a potato because the potato doesn't bleed and try to run away. You're still only thinking about yours…

> So you just shifted the goal posts, huh? First you cared about killing a sentient being, now you care about their suffering. FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. And why do you keep comparing animals to potatoes? As noted before, it's a scientific fact that plants are not the same as animals. They don't have pain receptors or a central…

> FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer.

Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try.

Nah, actually, not a nice try. Just even more typical vegan dishonesty and trying to win an argument by peddling lies.

> It says most vegans have no problems.

Nope. It says most vegans aren't clinically deficient. But it says very clearly that most vegans also have low homocysteine levels that put them at risk of heart disease, stroke and pregnancy complications.

> Look, I get that your identity seems to be tied heavily to food - I mean your user name 'cheese_goddess' gives a clue.

That's calling the kettle black, coming from a vegan (I mean, assuming you are vegan). My handle, which seems to trigger vegans on HN, is chosen because I'm an amateur cheesemaker and I had thought when I created it that I could contribute to discussions with my empirical knowledge of cheesemaking and some little things I know about dairy science and technology.

But it just so happens that any HN thread on anything to do with food is immediately invaded by hungry vegans keen on spreading their ideology. So I keep getting embroiled in these silly little internet arguments with people like you, who care nothing about anything but getting people to agree that eating meat is bad.

I don't even eat that much meat. I eat it maybe ... once a week? Every two weeks? It's not like I'm keeping count. I eat beef maybe once every five years, because I don't like it. I grew up on a Mediterrannean diet and I still cook and eat that way. I find the people who say we should eat only meat about as mad as vegans, and about as unhealthy.

So no, it's nothing to do with identity. It's just that all that stuff you say is mad. That we should eat only plants is as mad as saying we should eat only meat. It is mad people saying mad stuff on the mad internet. Mad mad mad.

> Your statement goes against many nutrition experts

It doesn't. What goes against those physicians you list is research that consistently finds that vegans are lacking in basic nutrients, that older vegans have more health issues, and that children fed vegan diets by their parents end up stunted, or dead. I linked to a bunch of those above and further down this sorry excuse for a thread.

Why are all those physicians contradicting common research findings? Well, I have no clue. But I know who I'm siding with. The 17,000 "physicians" saying that it's fine to cut out a major food group from your diet? Or the researchers who say that if you do, you're in risk of malnutrition? Guess which one makes more sense.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So you just shifted the goal posts, huh? First you cared about killing a sentient being, now you care about their suffering. FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. And why do you keep comparing animals to potatoes? As noted before, it's a scientific fact that plants are not the same as animals. They don't have pain receptors or a central…

> FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. Nah, actually, not a nice try. Just even more typical vegan dishonesty and trying to win an argument by peddling lies. > It says most vegans have no problems. Nope. It sa…

> Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try.

According to a dictionary. I think if we want to have a meaningful debate, we need to stick to certain established definitions and this includes the meaning of suffering.

How am I moving the goal post?

The topic I'm talking about is that our current global food system and a heavy diet of meat & dairy is considerably contributing towards our biosphere destruction and that this meat & dairy diet causes unnecessary cruelty towards other animals.

> It's just that all that stuff you say is mad.

What is mad about listening to scientists?

What is mad about finding ways to not destroy our biosphere?

What is mad about not killing and exploiting other sentient beings when we don't need to?

Whay is mad about not creating a horrific industry (slaughterhouses) that gives people PTSD?

> I linked to a bunch of those above [...] Vegan diest are not healthy.

Then why do health and nutrition experts disagree with you? Are you a doctor or health expert? Why does The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics say ""Vegetarian and vegan diets are healthful, may prevent and treat chronic diseases, and are better for the environment"

Why does the UN and IPCC recommend a more plant-based diet?

You linked to the following sites and both of them said there are no real concerns with a vegan diet - just need to ensure you eat plant based foods that have the nutrients you need and supplement accordingly.

1) https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/2528709

"As noted above, a well-planned and carefully followed vegetarian diet can satisfy the nutrient requirements for infants and children, and thus cause no real concern."

2) https://www.vegansociety.com/resources/nutrition-and-health/...

"In choosing to use fortified foods or B12 supplements, vegans are taking their B12 from the same source as every other animal on the planet - micro-organisms - without causing suffering to any sentient being or causing environmental damage.

Vegans using adequate amounts of fortified foods or B12 supplements are much less likely to suffer from B12 deficiency than the typical meat eater. The Institute of Medicine, in setting the US recommended intakes for B12 makes this very clear."

B12 is not produced by animals. We don't have to kill animals to get B12.

So considering all of the above - it's a fact that we don't need meat to survive.

So please answer this question for me:

If we can avoid cruelty and violence towards other sentient beings - why don't we?

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#163

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So you just shifted the goal posts, huh? First you cared about killing a sentient being, now you care about their suffering. FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. And why do you keep comparing animals to potatoes? As noted before, it's a scientific fact that plants are not the same as animals. They don't have pain receptors or a central…

> FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. Nah, actually, not a nice try. Just even more typical vegan dishonesty and trying to win an argument by peddling lies. > It says most vegans have no problems. Nope. It sa…

> I don't even eat that much meat. I eat it maybe ... once a week?

> I grew up on a Mediterrannean diet and I still cook and eat that way.

Good! And I already said previously if more people had your diet and life-style then we'd be in a much better situation environmentally.

And the next evolution from that would be not having to kill BILLIONS of animals for meat. We can create meat subs from plants, e.g. beyond burgers or wait for meat grown from animal cells also known as cultured meat.

That's all veganism is. No cruelty, death and destruction when it's not necessary.

Let's use our human ingenuity to solve our world's problems.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#164

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I eat food because it fills my belly, not because it looks good. Why can't we fill our bellies with food that doesn't involve exploiting and killing other sentient animals? If you have your own farm then ignore the above. It's a general question regarding the global food production. But not everyone can have their own farm - so that way of life is not scalable - if the majority of 9B people want to eat meat. It can…

> Why can't we fill our bellies with food that doesn't involve exploiting and killing other sentient animals? Nah, you're moving the goal posts just to get a chance to say your little propaganda slogan. What I asked was: "I don't get why you have to eat fake food when you're vegan? ". You want to talk about that? Because that's what I want to know. You don't want to eat meat? OK. You don't want to eat dairy? Then don…

It's not fake.

It's just an alternative that doesn't involve killing animals. For example, beyond burgers or impossible burgers, helps meat eaters who want to reduce their environmental footprint, transition to a more plant-based diet.

Or say you want to have spaghetti bolognese - instead of using minced animal meat you use an plant-based alternative which is better. And most people don't notice a difference these days.

Or say chicken nuggets - the plant based alternative - pretty amazing and in blind tests most people couldn't tell.

Food science is pretty amazing these days.

So what's wrong with that?

I personally don't need those products, as I don't have a craving for meat or dairy. But I have them some times.

But others do crave it, but they don't want to support factory farms - so these plant-based alternative products help.

And what is vegan propaganda?

All veganism does is promote a life style that's free from cruelty as much as possible.

What is wrong with reducing cruelty and environmental destruction?

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#165

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. Nah, actually, not a nice try. Just even more typical vegan dishonesty and trying to win an argument by peddling lies. > It says most vegans have no problems. Nope. It sa…

> I don't even eat that much meat. I eat it maybe ... once a week? > I grew up on a Mediterrannean diet and I still cook and eat that way. Good! And I already said previously if more people had your diet and life-style then we'd be in a much better situation environmentally. And the next evolution from that would be not having to kill BILLIONS of animals for meat. We can create meat subs from plants, e.g. beyond burg…

Killing an animal for meat is not cruelty. We eat meat. It comes from animals. The alternative is to eat the meat while the animal is alive, which is how it is normally done in the natural world. That is cruelty. A cruelty that humans do not bestow on their food.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> FYI, the definition of suffering is: "to endure death, pain, or distress". So if you kill an animal, it will suffer. Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. Nah, actually, not a nice try. Just even more typical vegan dishonesty and trying to win an argument by peddling lies. > It says most vegans have no problems. Nope. It sa…

> Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. According to a dictionary. I think if we want to have a meaningful debate, we need to stick to certain established definitions and this includes the meaning of suffering. How am I moving the goal post? The topic I'm talking about is that our current global food system and a heavy diet o…

> How am I moving the goal post?

For example, you want from being concern about killing, to being concerned about suffering, to being concerned about the environment, to arguing how healthy it is to eat a vegan diet, and now you're concerned about cruelty.

In truth, you don't care about any of those things. You're just promoting your ideology on the internet. Or rather, in an HN thread that nobody even reads besides you and me. Yawn.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why can't we fill our bellies with food that doesn't involve exploiting and killing other sentient animals? Nah, you're moving the goal posts just to get a chance to say your little propaganda slogan. What I asked was: "I don't get why you have to eat fake food when you're vegan? ". You want to talk about that? Because that's what I want to know. You don't want to eat meat? OK. You don't want to eat dairy? Then don…

It's not fake. It's just an alternative that doesn't involve killing animals. For example, beyond burgers or impossible burgers, helps meat eaters who want to reduce their environmental footprint, transition to a more plant-based diet. Or say you want to have spaghetti bolognese - instead of using minced animal meat you use an plant-based alternative which is better. And most people don't notice a difference these da…

> Or say chicken nuggets - the plant based alternative - pretty amazing and in blind tests most people couldn't tell.

Because chicken nuggets are shit food and they don't even taste like chicken anyway. That's because they're made with pink slurry, bits of chicken mechanically separated from bones and chemically treated until they're transformed into a vile, noxious paste, the lowest-grade meat that is allowed for human consumption. That's why they're so cheap.

Here, this is how chicken nuggets are made:

https://youtu.be/kS3kmulj20M?t=621

And here's a little close up:

https://youtu.be/kS3kmulj20M?t=654

Aaw. Isn't food science amazing these days?

That's what your vegan nuggets replace. And they do a great job at it! Because they're equally shit.

Fake food replacing fake food for people who don't know what real food tastes like anymore. That is the dystopian reality we live in, but for vegans it's paradise.

> And what is vegan propaganda?

Oh, well, for example lying about the role of meat production in environmental destruction and trying to get people to believe it's farming that's destroying the environment rather than buring fossil fuels. That's propaganda, and it's dangerous propaganda from people who care not a shit about the environment and only care about meat meat meat.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I don't even eat that much meat. I eat it maybe ... once a week? > I grew up on a Mediterrannean diet and I still cook and eat that way. Good! And I already said previously if more people had your diet and life-style then we'd be in a much better situation environmentally. And the next evolution from that would be not having to kill BILLIONS of animals for meat. We can create meat subs from plants, e.g. beyond burg…

Killing an animal for meat is not cruelty. We eat meat. It comes from animals. The alternative is to eat the meat while the animal is alive, which is how it is normally done in the natural world. That is cruelty. A cruelty that humans do not bestow on their food.

FYI, the definition of cruel from the Oxford dictionary is "cruelty (to somebody/something) behaviour that causes physical or mental pain to others and makes them suffer, especially deliberately"

And why is the alternative eating an animal alive? Have you ever tried to eat a cow alive? Was it enjoyable and tasty?

Why is the alternative not eating the animal at all?

Let's use some logic here.

Here are some facts:

Fact 1

So it's been already established that you don't need meat to survive. Your own articles you shared state that you can have a healthy life on plant-based foods alone. You just need to ensure to get the necessary nutrients, either by supplementing or eating a bigger variety of plant based foods.

Fact 2

The large scale animal agriculture industry is a big contributing factor to the destruction of our biosphere. This has been backed up by numerous credible organizations, like the UN, IPCC, Oxford University and many others.

Fact 3

Animals feel pain. Animals are not plants. And killing an animal will mean it suffers, which is an act of cruelty. Simple test... has an animal ever freely given up its life, so you can eat its flesh? When you start slicing an animal with a knife, what do you think it will do. Will it think "yes please kill me and ingest my flesh" or will it run away?

Fact 4

Killing animals all day every day is a horrible job and it's PTSD inducing. So continuing to buy meat products means you're sponsoring the continuation of slaughter houses, where many people have to work because they have no other options.

So given the above... why would you choose to eat meat when you could avoid the following by not eating meat and following a more plant-based diet:

A) Lower environmental footprint, which is required to avert a climate catastrophe

B) No sentient being has to suffer because you want some meat or cheese

C) People don't have to work in PTSD inducing slaughterhouses

I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on this.

I'm asking the same question over and over again - but you seem to skirt around it.

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Really? According to whom? According to you who came up with it just now, so you can justify moving the goalposts? Haha. Nice try. According to a dictionary. I think if we want to have a meaningful debate, we need to stick to certain established definitions and this includes the meaning of suffering. How am I moving the goal post? The topic I'm talking about is that our current global food system and a heavy diet o…

> How am I moving the goal post? For example, you want from being concern about killing, to being concerned about suffering, to being concerned about the environment, to arguing how healthy it is to eat a vegan diet, and now you're concerned about cruelty. In truth, you don't care about any of those things. You're just promoting your ideology on the internet. Or rather, in an HN thread that nobody even reads besides…

Let me repeat it again and not use too many words this time.

The topic is:

The meat & dairy industry causes environmental destruction and it's unnecessarily cruel towards other animals.

We've reached a point in human and technological evolution that we don't need to exploit & kill animals for our own survival anymore.

The official definition of veganism is:

"Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."

What's wrong with trying to promote that way of thinking?

Please tell me what is wrong about avoiding cruelty, killing and environmental destruction if all you have to do is not support the meat & dairy industry and not eating animals?

Re: Meat made from recycled carbon dioxide

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not fake. It's just an alternative that doesn't involve killing animals. For example, beyond burgers or impossible burgers, helps meat eaters who want to reduce their environmental footprint, transition to a more plant-based diet. Or say you want to have spaghetti bolognese - instead of using minced animal meat you use an plant-based alternative which is better. And most people don't notice a difference these da…

> Or say chicken nuggets - the plant based alternative - pretty amazing and in blind tests most people couldn't tell. Because chicken nuggets are shit food and they don't even taste like chicken anyway. That's because they're made with pink slurry, bits of chicken mechanically separated from bones and chemically treated until they're transformed into a vile, noxious paste, the lowest-grade meat that is allowed for hu…

> Oh, well, for example lying about the role of meat production in environmental destruction

Again, are you saying that Oxford Uni, IPCC, UN and many other credible organizations are lying?

> transformed into a vile, noxious paste, the lowest-grade meat that is allowed for human consumption.

Have you ever watched how actual chicken nuggets are produced? Have you ever watched what goes on in the meat & dairy industry? You can find out more here: http://www.nationearth.com/

In the meat industry you have disgusting pink slime. See https://www.livescience.com/33786-pink-slime.html

Post reply on HN