Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you life with something chronic? Something were not a lot of people are doing research and we're there was no real discovery in the last 20 years? Because I do and you know how scattered the field of medicine is? There is one realistic way of getting more people with chronic issues new threatments and it's data. Lots and lots of it. IF someone can pull that of while protecting the individuals I believe it's alphab…
Free medicine, but we alter your gene code to put ads in your poop.
Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
121–130 of 227 posts
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#122Please no. They have too much info on everyone already
A merger of technology privacy invading, ai-guiding, rip off processes AND the ability to direct your health for profit. With government lobbyists in both pockets.
What could go right?!?
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#123Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#124Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#125Just imagine a world where they revolutionized healthcare as they did with advertising!
Easy to imagine: patient records will now include ads for expensive drugs. Doctors can make $ on the side by referring patients to Google Pharma. Drug labs can dig a moat around their products by buying ad placements in doctors' digital prescription pads.
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#126Just imagine a world where they revolutionized healthcare as they did with advertising!
Easy to imagine: patient records will now include ads for expensive drugs. Doctors can make $ on the side by referring patients to Google Pharma. Drug labs can dig a moat around their products by buying ad placements in doctors' digital prescription pads.
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#127Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#128This is nothing new. MSFT, Alphabet, AMZN, Oracle have all been making plays for years trying to get into the healthcare industry. It's a huge, bloated industry
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#129Just imagine a world where they revolutionized healthcare as they did with advertising!
After wasting many millions on failures like Calico, Google hasn't learned that healthcare is a service that's continuous, custom, and complex. And since the "customer's" health and life are at stake, maintaining health is a damned sight more important and difficult to do sufficiently well than Google's current business: spam.
Tech companies like Google simply don't have the DNA or the persistence to succeed in science-based markets driven by R&D and heavy regulation. They want faster profits driven by higher multipliers and lower standards for accuracy than you can get in healthcare, where accuracy really counts and every case is a little bit different. In medicine it really matters if you get the right answer for your A/B test, otherwise someone may die or they may sue you. That's why so little of healthcare has been automated, and why that's likely to continue.
Re: Alphabet is spending billions to become a force in health care
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
> IF someone can pull that of while protecting the individuals I believe it's alphabet. Together with deep mind and all the other research they do. What makes you think they will protect the "individuals"? From a privacy persepctive, I would say they have no clear incentive in doing that, given individuals are the product they sell to companies that need to push ads into society.
Checkout their last Google Io. They know how they make their money and don't hide it. But they make you as an individual disappear. It's a much better compromise than from any other company and they drive this topic for years.
At the end of the day, it's just you by a different name. Instead of owning it and claiming "we have this information on Gehlitio" they say things like "We have these generalizations about anybody who happens to use HN, speaks in English, bought X Y and Z, subscribes to A, "