Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
1–10 of 254 posts
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#2If hydrogen becomes inexpensive to produce, it will by by way of solar power used to generate it.
It will never be easy to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element, and can move through solid objects over time. It is violently explosive. You think these EV fires you see all the time are bad? They're nothing compared to gasoline fires. And gasoline fires are nothing compared to a hydrogen explosion.
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#3Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#4It would. Yet there is no promising tech in this field. Hydrogen is supported only to draw support away from EVs. If hydrogen becomes inexpensive to produce, it will by by way of solar power used to generate it. It will never be easy to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element, and can move through solid objects over time. It is violently explosive. You think these EV fires you see all the time are bad? They're nothin…
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#5It would. Yet there is no promising tech in this field. Hydrogen is supported only to draw support away from EVs. If hydrogen becomes inexpensive to produce, it will by by way of solar power used to generate it. It will never be easy to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element, and can move through solid objects over time. It is violently explosive. You think these EV fires you see all the time are bad? They're nothin…
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#6It would. Yet there is no promising tech in this field. Hydrogen is supported only to draw support away from EVs. If hydrogen becomes inexpensive to produce, it will by by way of solar power used to generate it. It will never be easy to store. Hydrogen is the smallest element, and can move through solid objects over time. It is violently explosive. You think these EV fires you see all the time are bad? They're nothin…
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#7Thanks Bill, that's really helpful, was there really no other way you could have phrased that?
> Another option is to produce hydrogen using the current methods that burn fossil fuels and then capture the CO2 produced in the process before it’s released in the atmosphere. It may never be economical to capture 100 percent of the carbon released using incumbent technologies, but while we’re waiting for thousands of industrial facilities to retrofit their infrastructure, carbon capture can help drive emissions way down.
Oh dear.
Was expecting him to shill for expensive nuclear generated (aka pink) hydrogen but he went one better and started pushing the dead end that is blue hydrogen.
Make green hydrogen, make lots of it. The more we make the cheaper it'll get. This is not complicated.
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#8The question is all in the numbers. What are the estimated prices of the four methods he mentions? What are their near term prospects for price reduction and/or efficiency gains? What are the crossover points between the economics of exiting methane steam reformation and the alternatives? What would drive those crossover points (a certain cost for solar? a certain scope of carbon pricing?).
I realize gatesnotes aren't meant to be deep dives, but it is genuinely infuriating how childishly oversimplified this discourse always is.
Re: Cheap, green hydrogen would be a breakthrough in clean energy
#9Sure, digging up old buried hydrocarbons and burning them isn't good, but couldn't we start synthesizing light hydrocarbons using green technology, so at least those usages are carbon neutral?