Extension activation failed: "Unexpected end of JSON input"
GitHub Copilot is generally available
171–180 of 796 posts
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#172HN can set itself apart from Twitter and Reddit by celebrating great achievements rather than tearing them down.
Copilot stands on the shoulders of open source, yes. So do many of our personal and commercial projects. Copilot benefitted from having beta users. That relationship went both ways.
A big thanks to the Copilot team for letting us be a part of the beta. I will happily pay $10/m for this.
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#173Earlier quoted context omitted.
> train on open source projects To be specific, the FAQ states: "It has been trained on natural language text and source code from publicly available sources, including code in public repositories on GitHub." Some have raised concerns that Copilot violates at least the spirit of many open source licenses, laundering otherwise unusable code by sprinkling magic AI dust... most likely leaving the Copilot user responsibl…
Another concern is that nearly every stackoverflow answer or wikipedia article that isn't a trivial algorithm tends to be buggy at its edge conditions. Most of them look like they were submitted by college students and not experts.
Been a hell of a decade, hasn't it.
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#174My unpopular take: most comments here are super entitled. To paraphrase: "sure it's minblowing and the biggest productivity gain in years, but I want it FREE". Yes. You got used to it being free. And now it's not. But $10/mo is a steal. It's more than fair and far, far less than they could get. And no. They don't owe you anything. In fact, they probably host your code (often free), and less directly provide your IDE…
That money isn't going to the folks who wrote the code to begin with though. I think that's where "it should be free" has merit, GitHub is making money on the backs of others.
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#175My unpopular take: most comments here are super entitled. To paraphrase: "sure it's minblowing and the biggest productivity gain in years, but I want it FREE". Yes. You got used to it being free. And now it's not. But $10/mo is a steal. It's more than fair and far, far less than they could get. And no. They don't owe you anything. In fact, they probably host your code (often free), and less directly provide your IDE…
That money isn't going to the folks who wrote the code to begin with though. I think that's where "it should be free" has merit, GitHub is making money on the backs of others.
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#176My unpopular take: most comments here are super entitled. To paraphrase: "sure it's minblowing and the biggest productivity gain in years, but I want it FREE". Yes. You got used to it being free. And now it's not. But $10/mo is a steal. It's more than fair and far, far less than they could get. And no. They don't owe you anything. In fact, they probably host your code (often free), and less directly provide your IDE…
I do think they should pay the folks whose code they used to train the AI. Something like how Spotify pays artists based on how much their music/content is listened to.
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is curious - I maintain 2 projects with 2k cumulative stars, and I was able to claim the free access. Wonder what the metric is? Maybe creation date has something to do with it?
If you want to check if you qualify: https://github.com/github-copilot/free_signup
Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#178Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#179Re: GitHub Copilot is generally available
#180Shouldn't Copilot technically be FOSS since it trains on open source?