Live data from Hacker News

Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

theatlantic.com

201–210 of 349 posts

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#201

Throwaway because I run a large dental software company. Dentistry is practiced as a business focused on maximizing revenue. Dentists are routinely coached to deploy sales tactics to increase their treatment acceptance beyond what is needed. If you walk into a dental office, you need to protect yourself from being abused. A second opinion unfortunately puts you in the same position, but now with a new dentist who wil…

Is it just me or do dentists rarely if ever suggest that their adult patients change their diet to avoid dental caries? They probably still tell children "don't eat candy", but since I reached adulthood I don't think a dentist ever told me suggested that the reason I needed so many cavities drilled was because I was feeding bacteria in my mouth. If my experience is as ubiquitous as I suspect, there seems to be a perv…

> If my experience is as ubiquitous as I suspect, there seems to be a perverse incentive among dentists to allow adults to ruin their own teeth.

If you read the thread, some dentists will perform needless work on healthy teeth to make money, so I doubt there’s an incentive to let adults ruin their teeth when you can just lie and say they need the work anyways.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#202
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've told this story here before, but I grew up with very health-illiterate parents, who were very "old school" in the sense that if anyone in a white coat said something, it was gospel. Doctor, dentist, nurse, whatever (curiously they had and still have extremely negative opinions of medical paraprofessionals like PAs and NPs). Anyway, I was around 15 or 16 and had always had perfect dental checkups. One day I had a…

> curiously they had and still have extremely negative opinions of medical paraprofessionals like PAs and NPs This isn't entirely unfounded. There are real concerns over replacing MDs with mid-levels with much less training. The AMA is significantly to blame for the switch, but as a general rule I won't see PA/NPs for anything beyond prescription refills or something like that.

But that routine care is a good case for PAs/NPs. Pulling blood once and year and refilling my inhaler doesn’t require any speciality knowledge that only an MD would have. Most people shouldn’t have any reason to avoid one for their annual check or treating a run-of-the-mill illness.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#203
post #37

If you think this is bad, wait till you hear about [insert field of medicine here]! In all seriousness, fraud is rampant, and cash pay or low regulation fields like dentistry can easily take advantage of patients and their health literacy. In ophthalmology, you hear of “laser” cataract surgery, “floaterectomies”, telling patients they need cataract surgery well before they are symptomatic, dry eye treatments. Hell, i…

I am especially skeptical of offerings that deal with therapy and the massive advertising campaign some companies like betterhelp. Improvement from therapy is not something that’s easily measurable and I’ve know a few therapists (not psychologists) and their coursework from reputable universities absolutely shocked me in its lack of scientific rigor. I have no doubt there are wonderful and competent folks working at…

> "Improvement from therapy is not something that’s easily measurable"

Is it not? I have commented before about the work of Dr David Burns[1], and one thing he drills over and over is that therapists need to start measuring their work, and it is easy, and they don't because they either don't want to hear that they are doing a bad job or they depend on their clients for long term income and so aren't incentivised to want improvement. He endorses a mood survey[2] which the patient/client fills in at the start and end of every session. If the patient self-reports "I feel 5/5 hopeless" and two sessions later they report "I feel 2/5 hopeless", isn't that a measurable improvment? if instead they say "I still feel 5/5 hopeless" isnt' that a measurable lack of improvment?

It isn't an objective quantification but if the reason for seeking help is self-reported bad feelings, and afterwards the bad feelings are reduced or gone, the evidence for improvement is at least as strong as the original evidence of a problem existing. And it's easy to find out if the bad feelings are reduced or gone by asking. See some examples in the podcast summary here[3] talking about studying the effectiveness of the therapy app they are working on: "two groups, including 60 participants with moderate to extremely severe depression at the start of the day, and 73 participants with no or only mild feelings of depression. [...] The reductions in depression in both groups, as well as the additional six negative feelings, were substantially greater than the reductions reported in large numbers of published outcome studies with cognitive therapy, other schools of therapy, and antidepressants. All seven types of feelings were dramatically reduced in both groups. For example, the depression reduction was 62% and 51% in the severe and mild groups, respectively, and the anger reduction was 70% and 81%, respectively"

and

"The feedback we received on the app has been largely totally unexpected. Some things that we thought were blow-away were criticized, and some parts that we thought were weak were strongly celebrated. This experience has been much like using David’s feedback scales in therapy. Therapists learn that their perceptions of how their patient feel are often not[?] off-base, and that many of your favorite techniques and strategies are not effective. This information, if processed with respect and humility, can transform your clinical practice."

[1] Dr Burns does the Feeling Good podcast ( https://feelinggood.com/list-of-feeling-good-podcasts/ ) and book, is a retired Professor from Stanford Uni, was a pioneer in Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, and now works promoting his TEAMS CBT model which has insights on how to hone in quickly on the reasons people are stuck and can't change, and then how to get past that.

[2] One of the mood surveys https://feelinggood.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/brief-moo...

[3] https://feelinggood.com/2022/02/28/the-feeling-good-app-part...

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#204

How to find a trusty dentist? In my country most seem charlatans doing expensive unneeded procedures or doing a poor job deliberately in order to take more money after a while.

I've had good luck checking their education. What school did they graduate from? Try to find a dentist from a prestigious school.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#205
Like many others I thought my family was predisposed to bad teeth based on the number of diagnosed cavities my sister and I had in HS/college (she had probably 10 fillings before college and I had 3). Then I moved to a new city and that last cavity I’d needed to get treated ASAP suddenly disappeared when I received my new dentist’s check up. She mentioned that there’s a lot of leeway in how cavities are defined and some dentists will lean very aggressive in their diagnosis (IMO crossing over into outright fraud or deception in my case). I’ve never had a cavity since that first dentist.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#206

In my experience, the majority of dentists are criminal crooks. It‘s generally not nice to trick and steal from people, but dentists are in the unique position of leaving their victims in severe, chronic pain that can only be fixed by other dentists. I myself suffer from varying, chronic pain after a pointless visit where two "tiny" holes were drilled.

The problem is you can only evaluate them over years , which is incredibly sucky. I haven't found a solution to working out which dentists are actually the best yet, which makes me loathe to leave the one I have currently because it has been almost 10 years of good care (I can contrast with the bad ones that had fillings that fell out within 3-4 years etc.)

Finding a truly good one is astrology. I generally assume that only greedy humans become dentists. And dentistry has infinite possibilities to apply greed to make more money by needles or harmful medical interventions.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#207
In Italy until not long ago, dentists were a branch of medicine: you had you study medicine and then specialize in dentistry.

Now, also in Italy the Anglo American idea that dentists are not fully medicine has been adopted as well, and at the university there is a path for dentistry alone. And it doesn't make any sense.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#208
I had to switch dentists last year due to my former, excellent dentist closing his practice. I had heard of these kinds of stories. I knew I had a cracked filling (my old dentist had told me so) and his advice on a previous visit was "you should get it fixed some time, but it's not urgent." When my new dentist also identified the cracked filling and said exactly the same thing, I figured he was not out to rip me off, or else he would have said it was an urgent problem requiring a filling or even root canal therapy.

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#209
post #43
post #5

After experiencing this first hand in the US it was really nice to return back to Europe where in my opinion unnecessary operations and active selling of special cleaning procedures are somewhat more rare. I just had my yearly checkup and the dentist again noticed few small inactive cavities and said we should just monitor them like last year.

In Germany pretty much every dentist will recommend you a "profesionelle Zahnreinigung" (professional tooth cleaning), and if you lookup what studies exist to show that it does any good, there's only one study that's basically useless (they tested a combination of the professional tooth cleaning and a lecture on proper self tooth cleaning and showed that this helps, so in the end you know one of those or a combinatio…

The tooth cleaning is much the same as what happens on the yearly cleaning your insurance pays for (and highly recommends you do). Is that one also "basically useless"? How much study does one need to judge if mechanical dental tartar removal is beneficial?

Re: Dentistry is less scientific and more gratuitous than people think (2019)

#210

Throwaway because I run a large dental software company. Dentistry is practiced as a business focused on maximizing revenue. Dentists are routinely coached to deploy sales tactics to increase their treatment acceptance beyond what is needed. If you walk into a dental office, you need to protect yourself from being abused. A second opinion unfortunately puts you in the same position, but now with a new dentist who wil…

Is it just me or do dentists rarely if ever suggest that their adult patients change their diet to avoid dental caries? They probably still tell children "don't eat candy", but since I reached adulthood I don't think a dentist ever told me suggested that the reason I needed so many cavities drilled was because I was feeding bacteria in my mouth. If my experience is as ubiquitous as I suspect, there seems to be a perv…

A dentist once told me that it's worse for my teeth to sip a soda or a coffee slowly over several hours than to chug it all at once. I wonder if it was suggested because patients might actually do that, compared to not drinking soda or coffee at all.

(I might drink coffee slightly faster than I used to. I do not drink soda. I'm fine with stains but not unnecessary tooth decay.)

Post reply on HN