I kind of feel it is going to end up being used in food packaging, marketed along the lines of smart-packaging. Not sure how well the sensor market is and if some could be built in if not already, but it sure does seem to be that such cheap plastic chips only lean themselves being a cheap disposable item. What value they will add, may well vary, but a few pennies upon many items they would be targeting, well those it…
The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
51–60 of 72 posts
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#52Does anyone have a good idea for use cases for these? It seems a lot of use cases for "small, cheap electronics" are already covered by RFID, where you keep the processing "smarts" in the device that reads the RFID. So when do you need actual computation to take part on each tiny chip? Some kind of "smart dust" mesh network? (assuming you can pair these chips with an antenna and power source)
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#53I kind of feel it is going to end up being used in food packaging, marketed along the lines of smart-packaging. Not sure how well the sensor market is and if some could be built in if not already, but it sure does seem to be that such cheap plastic chips only lean themselves being a cheap disposable item. What value they will add, may well vary, but a few pennies upon many items they would be targeting, well those it…
Hopefully just the packaging but i would not be surprised if someone puts them inside clothing or food.
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#54Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#55Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#56Asking the dumb question. How does plastic conduct electricity...
It's not the plastic that conducts, instead it is the foundation which the conducting material is built upon.
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#57I love the teaching potential here - program this 4 or 8 bit processor. They are so cheap you can give them to pupils in volume that you don't care how they experiment with them, and there is potential that they are simple enough to literally fit in your head. More of these please - the opportunities must be there
The use cases for a student are more difficult to imagine - turn a light on an IO port is fun and somewhat education but you will need to do something more informative, like generate a coded signal, i.e. simulate an RFID chip (what I presume the commercial goal is here as well), but then vary based on some input(s)?
Its the same issue as with the current crop of low-cost computers - Raspberry Pi is great, but its most useful applications are due to its ethernet port and ability to drive a display, both of which drive up the price and board size.
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#58Does anyone have a good idea for use cases for these? It seems a lot of use cases for "small, cheap electronics" are already covered by RFID, where you keep the processing "smarts" in the device that reads the RFID. So when do you need actual computation to take part on each tiny chip? Some kind of "smart dust" mesh network? (assuming you can pair these chips with an antenna and power source)
Why the consumer would want to read info off of a banana, great question, but.
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#59Does anyone have a good idea for use cases for these? It seems a lot of use cases for "small, cheap electronics" are already covered by RFID, where you keep the processing "smarts" in the device that reads the RFID. So when do you need actual computation to take part on each tiny chip? Some kind of "smart dust" mesh network? (assuming you can pair these chips with an antenna and power source)
Just brainstorming, if the chip is large enough you could just plop a reader down on it.... not as convenient as RFID but then you could sell a reader which reads info off of bananas, e.g. Why the consumer would want to read info off of a banana, great question, but.
Re: The first high-yield, sub-penny plastic processor
#60Why would anyone actively work towards "ubiquitous electronics"? That sounds like a nightmare.
Do we not have ubiquitous electronics already? What hasn't got electronics shoved it that could meaningfully use them?