The crypto market is crashing for the same reason real financial markets are crashing. The problems with Celsius are an irrelevant blip.
Except the real financial markets have a bottom where contrarian investors will step in and stop the free fall. What tangible value is there for a contrarian investor in crypto?
Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
21–30 of 107 posts
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#22The crypto market is crashing for the same reason real financial markets are crashing. The problems with Celsius are an irrelevant blip.
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#23Oh boy oh boy that thread had lots of ETH and sETH and oETH und BTC and what not. No wonder that it's hard for some people to see the Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes and what else those things are called. Regulations anyone? Or do we now just see people loosing their money?
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#24Oh boy oh boy that thread had lots of ETH and sETH and oETH und BTC and what not. No wonder that it's hard for some people to see the Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes and what else those things are called. Regulations anyone? Or do we now just see people loosing their money?
On the other hand, it's quite easy. After the third flavor of ETH and nested contracts, I thought to myself "fuck, that's complicated." Then just follow Buffett's advice of not investing in things you don't understand.
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#25Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#26Does anyone have any inkling about Voyager? I only ask because when I was looking into it last year, seemed everyone said 'use Celsius or Voyager', so I assume they are somewhat similar. I used Voyager to get 9% APY on USDC just to test it, but chickened out and withdrew it all because I basically envisioned something like this happening.
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#27Does anyone have any inkling about Voyager? I only ask because when I was looking into it last year, seemed everyone said 'use Celsius or Voyager', so I assume they are somewhat similar. I used Voyager to get 9% APY on USDC just to test it, but chickened out and withdrew it all because I basically envisioned something like this happening.
what was the the business model of these platforms? did they lend out the staked money, or how did they generate these yields?
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#28Who said doublespent is impossible? Innovating your way out of such a limitation : "$stETH is a product by @LidoFinance. It stands for (liquid) staked $ETH and it's one of the most innovative DeFi products to be released in the last few years. $stETH can also be used to earn MORE yield than otherwise possible with vanilla $ETH. Why? Because while $stETH already earns staking yield, it can also be lent out or liquidit…
or more precisely
using collateral that's already beind used for collateral for something else.
see also rehypothecation
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#29Oh boy oh boy that thread had lots of ETH and sETH and oETH und BTC and what not. No wonder that it's hard for some people to see the Ponzi schemes, pyramid schemes and what else those things are called. Regulations anyone? Or do we now just see people loosing their money?
it was never really 'money', or even 'theirs' - just a consensual delusion that's falling apart
Re: Celsius Appears insolvent, and it's taking the whole crypto market with it
#30Does anyone have any inkling about Voyager? I only ask because when I was looking into it last year, seemed everyone said 'use Celsius or Voyager', so I assume they are somewhat similar. I used Voyager to get 9% APY on USDC just to test it, but chickened out and withdrew it all because I basically envisioned something like this happening.
what was the the business model of these platforms? did they lend out the staked money, or how did they generate these yields?
Step 2: give away money
Step 3: somehow start making money
Like most companies you'll see on HN, they are currently on step 2.
The discerning reader may note that this sounds like a terrible use for $860 million - and if that's the case, how much of the other $642 billion last year was properly allocated?